MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Rawk Hawk: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) m ("Any oppose (or support vote if the nomination is unfeaturing an article) vote that contains simply a fan vote such as "Mario is my favorite character, he should stay featured!" will be immediately removed.") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{UNFANOMSTAT | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=23:55, 5 October 2016 (EDT) | |nominated=23:55, 5 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
|passed= | |passed=18:17, 2 November 2016 (EDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|AfternoonLight}} Per both. Let's get rid of it. | #{{User|AfternoonLight}} Per both. Let's get rid of it. | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} One time characters are certainly difficult to write a good article on, as there really isn't much to go off of. Unfortunately, Rawk's is one such article. | #{{User|Alex95}} One time characters are certainly difficult to write a good article on, as there really isn't much to go off of. Unfortunately, Rawk's is one such article. | ||
#{{User|3D Player 2010}} Per all | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 18:17, November 2, 2016
Rawk Hawk
Remove featured article status
- Time Turner (talk) The intro paragraph is literally two sentences long. Both the Background and Powers and Abilities sections suffer the same issues of brevity, and the section covering TTYD covers far more than necessary while not being particularly well-written (beyond the tense issues, the article wrings as much fluff as it can out of every moment, which is to the article's detriment). Even if the writing was polished, there isn't much to be said about the character; there isn't enough content here to actually justify touting it as one of the wiki's best.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per Time Turner
- AfternoonLight (talk) Per both. Let's get rid of it.
- Alex95 (talk) One time characters are certainly difficult to write a good article on, as there really isn't much to go off of. Unfortunately, Rawk's is one such article.
- 3D Player 2010 (talk) Per all
