MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
#{{User|The Cosmic Vin|This should just be archived}} | #{{User|The Cosmic Vin|This should just be archived}} | ||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Per all. | #{{User|Bowser's luma}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Yoshitron}} Many people love this game, and it is extremely interesting. | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
Revision as of 13:25, February 1, 2011
Super Smash Bros. Brawl
Remove Featured Article Status
Keep Featured Article Status
- Marioguy1 (talk) - I went through it, that rewrite bar shouldn't have been there. I removed it.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) The article has minor grammar problems, but the errors are not enough for the article to unfeatured.
- Ultramariologan (talk) I went through the article; it was long and it had nice images. Per my comment below also.
- New Super Mario (talk) Per all. This is long, full of images and links for further reading
- Liamroche (talk) This article's length is huge!!!!! O_o
- Princess Yoshi (talk) It's very huge, and has a lot of info. It's a great article.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per all, but let's hope that this article is not poorly written like the Honeyhive article last time.
- This should just be archived (talk)
- Bowser's luma (talk) Per all.
- Yoshitron (talk) Many people love this game, and it is extremely interesting.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
You know, you could've tried fixing such a minor problem yourself... >_< LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Why does this article even NEED to be unfeatured just because it has a rewrite bar? Ultramariologan (talk)
- Featured articles are not supposed to have improvement templates on them. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Oh. I see. Ultramariologan (talk)
Liamroche: The article's size has nothing to do with its quality. As we say, quality over quantity. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
