MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Super Smash Bros.: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Shokora moved page MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Super Smash Bros. without leaving a redirect: requested)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{fa-archive}}
{{fa-archive|nominated=23:34, 22 May 2010 (EDT)|passed=14:05, 8 June 2010 (EDT)}}
'''Super Smash Bros. became a featured article at 13:05, 15 June 2010.'''
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Marcelagus}} -- The entire article is much more organized now. Many images are used to depict the aspects of the game, and gameplay/mode sections have been greatly expanded. This article is back up to par as an article of Featured Article quality.
#{{User|Marcelagus}} -- The entire article is much more organized now. Many images are used to depict the aspects of the game, and gameplay/mode sections have been greatly expanded. This article is back up to par as an article of Featured Article quality.
Line 21: Line 20:


:Let's just rewrite sentences with "players" instead of "the player" so we don't get this controversial issue. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
:Let's just rewrite sentences with "players" instead of "the player" so we don't get this controversial issue. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
[[Category:FA succession archives]]

Revision as of 06:38, May 28, 2018

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Smash Bros. was nominated to be a featured article at 23:34, 22 May 2010 (EDT) and passed at 13:05, 15 June 2010.


Support

  1. Marcelagus (talk) -- The entire article is much more organized now. Many images are used to depict the aspects of the game, and gameplay/mode sections have been greatly expanded. This article is back up to par as an article of Featured Article quality.
  2. KS3 (talk)
  3. Commander Code-8 (talk)
  4. Byllant (talk)
  5. BluePikminKong497 (talk)
  6. Paula (talk)

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

I see nothing wrong in this article, but some stages and items need more information. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I see an edit war brewing. Marcelagus, BabyLuigiOnFire, and I are constantly reverting each other's edits. Can we agree on something? This has to stop. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Let's just rewrite sentences with "players" instead of "the player" so we don't get this controversial issue. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)