MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bike: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[Bike]]===
{{FANOMFAIL
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=4:39, March 6, 2010  
|nominated=4:39, 6 March 2010
|lastedit=7:39, 15 April 2010
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|nosupport=false
}}
}}
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|KS3}} Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA.
#{{User|KS3}} Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA.
Line 14: Line 16:
#{{User|Byllant}} A lot of images? there are only two of them, and it's quite short.
#{{User|Byllant}} A lot of images? there are only two of them, and it's quite short.
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Oh, come on. This is way too short, or barely reaches the limit. It has barely any pictures, and could be better written. It's not always about prefect grammar, it's about if it is truthful.
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Oh, come on. This is way too short, or barely reaches the limit. It has barely any pictures, and could be better written. It's not always about prefect grammar, it's about if it is truthful.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Terrible article. Per all.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} The Mario Kart DS section is more something that should be in a trivia section, but the article barely says anything anyway


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Latest revision as of 11:58, September 14, 2016


Bike

Support

  1. KS3 (talk) Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA.

Oppose

  1. Reversinator (talk) Come on, a better introduction could surely be used. Also, the images make the article look disorganized.
  2. Coincollector (talk) The article is too short for me.
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Way too short, man. And a longer, better introduction.
  4. Byllant (talk) A lot of images? there are only two of them, and it's quite short.
  5. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) Oh, come on. This is way too short, or barely reaches the limit. It has barely any pictures, and could be better written. It's not always about prefect grammar, it's about if it is truthful.
  6. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Terrible article. Per all.
  7. Commander Code-8 (talk) The Mario Kart DS section is more something that should be in a trivia section, but the article barely says anything anyway

Removal of Opposes

Comments