MarioWiki talk:Chronology: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Format is fixed. Glad to have you back for things just like this, SoS. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 21:25, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | Format is fixed. Glad to have you back for things just like this, SoS. {{User:Wayoshi/sig}} 21:25, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
I think your proposal to instate a solid timeline is a good idea, but while you have obviosly put a lot of thought into how it should be done I feel your policy involving remakes could use some fine-tuning. As you said, most remakes are nothing more than re-releases with updated graphics, maintaining or adding on to the existing plot only. However, some do change the plot (as you said), and I think that if these changes are significant enough, the original and remake should '''not''' be considered one incident anymore. In your example of ''Super Mario 64'' and ''SM64 DS'', the plots are clearly different: in one Yoshi sleeps on the roof the entire time, in the other he saves Mario; both games are canocal, but they are far to different to be assumed to be different versions of one incident. A better assumption would be that Bowser attacked Peach's Castle twice (either at seperate times or one after another, both work). I hope I don't appear brash, but I've spent the better part of a year forming my own timeline and dealing with these problems, and I salute you for taking on this undertaking as well. - [[user:Walkazo]] | |||
Revision as of 23:20, August 26, 2007
Um... full support. Max2 (talk)
- If you want this to become effective, propose it. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:36, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
This is amazing. Mr. Way-with-words strikes again! Max2 (talk)
Hmmm... I didn't propose MarioWiki:Minor NPCs though. I like this idea anyway, it rocks.Knife (talk) 15:43, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- Just asking, what's the point of that note about Luigi's Mansion not being the last game? I mean, how could it be? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 17:27, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- A lot of people think it is the last game because of Bowser's apparent death (in fact I believe someone stated that on the main page in the last archive). Even if he did die before the game, we know characters can always be revived (I mean, he died in New Super Mario Bros., became an undead monster, and good ol' Junior brought him back to life). -- Son of Suns
- Bowser did also die in Mario is Missing!. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 17:42, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
- A lot of people think it is the last game because of Bowser's apparent death (in fact I believe someone stated that on the main page in the last archive). Even if he did die before the game, we know characters can always be revived (I mean, he died in New Super Mario Bros., became an undead monster, and good ol' Junior brought him back to life). -- Son of Suns
- Yep. But that is a low-canon game, so use discretion. ;) But again, death does not equal last game. -- Son of Suns
Format is fixed. Glad to have you back for things just like this, SoS. Wa 
TC@Y 21:25, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
I think your proposal to instate a solid timeline is a good idea, but while you have obviosly put a lot of thought into how it should be done I feel your policy involving remakes could use some fine-tuning. As you said, most remakes are nothing more than re-releases with updated graphics, maintaining or adding on to the existing plot only. However, some do change the plot (as you said), and I think that if these changes are significant enough, the original and remake should not be considered one incident anymore. In your example of Super Mario 64 and SM64 DS, the plots are clearly different: in one Yoshi sleeps on the roof the entire time, in the other he saves Mario; both games are canocal, but they are far to different to be assumed to be different versions of one incident. A better assumption would be that Bowser attacked Peach's Castle twice (either at seperate times or one after another, both work). I hope I don't appear brash, but I've spent the better part of a year forming my own timeline and dealing with these problems, and I salute you for taking on this undertaking as well. - user:Walkazo
