MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bike: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[Bike]]===
'''Bike was nominated for FA at 4:39, 6 March 2010, and failed at 07:39, 15 April 2010.'''
{{FANOMSTAT
 
|nominated=4:39, 6 March 2010
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|KS3}} Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA.
#{{User|KS3}} Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA.

Revision as of 14:47, April 15, 2010

Bike was nominated for FA at 4:39, 6 March 2010, and failed at 07:39, 15 April 2010.

Bike

Support

  1. KS3 (talk) Nice article, a lot of pics, no errors, perfect for the FA.

Oppose

  1. Reversinator (talk) Come on, a better introduction could surely be used. Also, the images make the article look disorganized.
  2. Coincollector (talk) The article is too short for me.
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Way too short, man. And a longer, better introduction.
  4. Byllant (talk) A lot of images? there are only two of them, and it's quite short.
  5. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) Oh, come on. This is way too short, or barely reaches the limit. It has barely any pictures, and could be better written. It's not always about prefect grammar, it's about if it is truthful.
  6. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Terrible article. Per all.
  7. Commander Code-8 (talk) The Mario Kart DS section is more something that should be in a trivia section, but the article barely says anything anyway

Removal of Opposes

Comments