MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart Wii: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the [[Mario Kart 8]] article. | #{{User|Supermariofan67}} - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the [[Mario Kart 8]] article. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Mostly per my comments below. The article still has quite a few problems that is enough to remove its FA status. | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 17:11, February 15, 2017
Mario Kart Wii
Remove featured article status
- Supermariofan67 (talk) - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the Mario Kart 8 article.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Mostly per my comments below. The article still has quite a few problems that is enough to remove its FA status.
Keep featured article status
Removal of support/oppose votes
Comments
The karts can use images. I know I *had* plans to upload renders of the karts but several things kept me from doing so:
- You have to piece bodies, frames, and tires together. This requires extracting a ton of models out of the kart file.
- You have to mirror the tiling for UVs for textures to display properly.
- I was too busy with other things.
Furthermore, this article can use traps and obstacles like Mario Kart 8.
Additionally, the gameplay section is a mess too. I hate how the very first header is "Changes". I still firmly believe it should explain what the main gameplay of it is first for potential new readers without having to jump to different articles for information.
I don't see the "poorly written" nor "many grammar mistakes" complaint though. It's probably being nitpicky at this point. 
Ray Trace(T|C) 00:56, 15 February 2017 (EST)
