Talk:Super MakerMatic 21: Difference between revisions
(→Oppose) |
(→Oppose) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per Dashbot. | #{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per Dashbot. | ||
#{{User|Stonehill}} Per Dashbot all the way. | #{{User|Stonehill}} Per Dashbot all the way. | ||
#{{User|Lumastar}} Why should we delete this page? Dashbot is right. The Super MakerMatic 21 is important to DIY's storyline and deserves its own article. | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== |
Revision as of 03:32, July 2, 2014
Delete this page
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, September 20, 2024, 20:19 GMT
Must I even say why? There's nothing to be found on this page. The Trivia and Names in Other Languages sections take up more room than the actual article.
Proposer: Vommack (talk)
Deadline: July 15, 2014, 23:59 GMT
Support
Oppose
- Dashbot (talk) The subject is significant to the DIY's storyline. It's not a generic subject, it is not a stub. There is no reason to delete such a page. If you have any writing problems with the article, just add a {{rewrite}}. Otherwise, bring that specific issue here on the talk page. Everything will get sorted out, eventually.
- SuperYoshiBros (talk) Per Dashbot.
- Stonehill (talk) Per Dashbot all the way.
- Lumastar (talk) Why should we delete this page? Dashbot is right. The Super MakerMatic 21 is important to DIY's storyline and deserves its own article.
Comments
This one I'm not exactly keen on deleting. It's the main thing of DIY, and we could put LOADS more info on here. if we were the Zelda Wiki, we wouldn't delete the Master Sword because it was a bad article. Maybe I'll clean this up and then we'll see I'd it's still worthy of deleting. - 17:09, 1 July 2014 (EDT)
- If you're willing too, sure. I was kind of on the fence going into it, but once I actually clicked on this article, my mind was set.--Vommack (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2014 (EDT)
It's a pretty poorly written article, but it's validity as a topic is debatable enough that I'm not in favor of an outright deletion. I say tag it for rewrite and see where that goes. If the rewrite doesn't work out, I'll agree to a deletion. -- Chris 22:21, 1 July 2014 (EDT)