MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Neo Bowser City: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=15:05, 2 September 2015
|nominated=15:05, 2 September 2015
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=20:35, 17 September 2015
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|ZonkMario64}} Yes, I tried a year ago, but it only failed because it was too short. It is longer now, therefore I think it should be featured.
#{{User|Roy Koopa}} Yes, I tried a year ago, but it only failed because it was too short. It is longer now, therefore I think it should be featured.
#{{User|PowerKamek}}
#{{User|PowerKamek}}
#{{User|Tails777}}
#{{User|Tails777}}
#{{User|The Pyro Guy}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Time Turner}} I think it's important to recognize that featured articles aren't just ticking boxes off of a checklist, they're standing on their own to feet in order to serve as a prime example to users in order to demonstrate what one of the wiki's best articles should look like. With that said, the article's very... eh. The intro proper is only two lines (and it doesn't even mention Mario Kart 8), with the rest of it being trivia points cobbled from the section, so that's already an immediate strike against it for me. The course layout also seems rather short, especially when there are other articles, like [[Koopa Cape]], [[Wuhu Loop]], and [[Shy Guy Bazaar]] with much more detail in the same section. Besides that, the grammar and spelling are fine, but it doesn't really inspire the "best of the best" qualities that I was talking about.
#{{User|Time Turner}} I think it's important to recognize that featured articles aren't just ticking boxes off of a checklist, they're standing on their own two feet in order to serve as a prime example of what one of the wiki's best articles should look like. With that said, the article's very... eh. The intro proper is only two lines (and it doesn't even mention Mario Kart 8), with the rest of it being trivia points cobbled from the section, so that's already an immediate strike against it for me. The course layout also seems rather short, especially when there are other articles, like [[Koopa Cape]], [[Wuhu Loop]], and [[Shy Guy Bazaar]] with much more detail in the same section. Besides that, the grammar and spelling are fine, but it doesn't really inspire the "best of the best" qualities that I was talking about.
#{{User|Boo4761}} Per Time Turner.
#{{user|Yoshi876}} Per TT.
 
==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


Line 19: Line 23:
:While it's a bit longer than before, I think the real question is does the quality of the article qualify for being featured? I mean outstanding or not, if an article has good quality and length, Mario Kart tracks can still be featured. Correct me if I'm wrong. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
:While it's a bit longer than before, I think the real question is does the quality of the article qualify for being featured? I mean outstanding or not, if an article has good quality and length, Mario Kart tracks can still be featured. Correct me if I'm wrong. {{User:Tails777/sig}}
::It's hard for me to determine since Neo Bowser City is pretty run-of-the-mill track article IMO and that there hasn't been a track featured yet, if I'm corrected or not. The quality seems "okay" ish since it did have some grammar issues I just corrected. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:42, 2 September 2015 (EDT)
::It's hard for me to determine since Neo Bowser City is pretty run-of-the-mill track article IMO and that there hasn't been a track featured yet, if I'm corrected or not. The quality seems "okay" ish since it did have some grammar issues I just corrected. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:42, 2 September 2015 (EDT)
@Time Turner There, I fixed the intro. I didn't want to go into too much detail (that's for its own section), so it's kinda short. To make it longer I'd have to add all sorts of flowers and the like [[File:SM64 Mario Sidekick.png|x35px]] [[User:ZonkMario64|<span style="color:green;"> Don't Get Zonked!</span>]] [[File:Question Block 3D.png|x35px]] ([[User talk:ZonkMario64|blabbing]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/ZonkMario64|what i do]]) 18:11, 6 September 2015 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 11:59, September 14, 2016

Neo Bowser City[edit]

Neo Bowser City was nominated for Featured Article status at 15:05, 2 September 2015.

Neo Bowser City failed FA status requirements at 20:35, 17 October 2015, and can currently be renominated.

Support[edit]

  1. Roy Koopa (talk) Yes, I tried a year ago, but it only failed because it was too short. It is longer now, therefore I think it should be featured.
  2. PowerKamek (talk)
  3. Tails777 (talk)
  4. The Pyro Guy (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Time Turner (talk) I think it's important to recognize that featured articles aren't just ticking boxes off of a checklist, they're standing on their own two feet in order to serve as a prime example of what one of the wiki's best articles should look like. With that said, the article's very... eh. The intro proper is only two lines (and it doesn't even mention Mario Kart 8), with the rest of it being trivia points cobbled from the section, so that's already an immediate strike against it for me. The course layout also seems rather short, especially when there are other articles, like Koopa Cape, Wuhu Loop, and Shy Guy Bazaar with much more detail in the same section. Besides that, the grammar and spelling are fine, but it doesn't really inspire the "best of the best" qualities that I was talking about.
  2. Boo4761 (talk) Per Time Turner.
  3. Yoshi876 (talk) Per TT.

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

The only major differences between the two articles is that there is a Mario Kart 8 section. I don't know if that's the difference for a featured article. I just don't think this article is outstanding, though. Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:21, 2 September 2015 (EDT)

While it's a bit longer than before, I think the real question is does the quality of the article qualify for being featured? I mean outstanding or not, if an article has good quality and length, Mario Kart tracks can still be featured. Correct me if I'm wrong. Sprite of Yoshi's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Tails777 Talk to me!Robin's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate
It's hard for me to determine since Neo Bowser City is pretty run-of-the-mill track article IMO and that there hasn't been a track featured yet, if I'm corrected or not. The quality seems "okay" ish since it did have some grammar issues I just corrected. Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:42, 2 September 2015 (EDT)

@Time Turner There, I fixed the intro. I didn't want to go into too much detail (that's for its own section), so it's kinda short. To make it longer I'd have to add all sorts of flowers and the like Mario Don't Get Zonked! ? Block (blabbing · what i do) 18:11, 6 September 2015 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N2/Neo_Bowser_City&oldid=2056833"