Template talk:Userspace: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
:That being said, this template does rarely change user's behaviors but if users continue making userspace edits after the friendly reminder, this puts them on ground for punishment. It's just like some people who keep putting false or misleading information in articles. We HOPE that they may change but this isn't guaranteed, hence why we SHOULD giving them a reminder/warning for blissfully IGNORING what we just notified of them doing. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 18:01, 4 November 2013 (EST)
:That being said, this template does rarely change user's behaviors but if users continue making userspace edits after the friendly reminder, this puts them on ground for punishment. It's just like some people who keep putting false or misleading information in articles. We HOPE that they may change but this isn't guaranteed, hence why we SHOULD giving them a reminder/warning for blissfully IGNORING what we just notified of them doing. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 18:01, 4 November 2013 (EST)
::I never said that this wiki is about editing one's userspace. It isn't. It's all about getting voluntary contributors. But we also shouldn't be criticizing here and there to people that edit their userspace, ''especially'' those that are new to wiki editing. The first rung of the wiki editing experience ladder is perhaps an exciting one, and people may be excited to edit their userspace a lot at first (after all, this is what [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Baby_Luigi&dir=prev&target=Baby+Luigi you] and [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/LeftyGreenMario&dir=prev&target=LeftyGreenMario I] did in the beginning; we, especially I, would've gotten a userspace warning). As you said, this template in general does nothing to encourage people to make more mainspace edits, so why must we have to take the next step to issue a reminder, a warning, and then a block? This just shows that this template is ineffective. This template '''is''' being treated as a reprimanding a user for mainspace edits. And it doesn't work. Ideally, once a user gets this message, the user should NOT get a reminder/warning/block after this, but this often isn't the case. OFTEN is a key word here. Of course there are people that will ignore those kind of things, but this reminder is ineffective, and something needs to be addressed. <br>{{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 18:38, 4 November 2013 (EST)
::I never said that this wiki is about editing one's userspace. It isn't. It's all about getting voluntary contributors. But we also shouldn't be criticizing here and there to people that edit their userspace, ''especially'' those that are new to wiki editing. The first rung of the wiki editing experience ladder is perhaps an exciting one, and people may be excited to edit their userspace a lot at first (after all, this is what [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Baby_Luigi&dir=prev&target=Baby+Luigi you] and [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/LeftyGreenMario&dir=prev&target=LeftyGreenMario I] did in the beginning; we, especially I, would've gotten a userspace warning). As you said, this template in general does nothing to encourage people to make more mainspace edits, so why must we have to take the next step to issue a reminder, a warning, and then a block? This just shows that this template is ineffective. This template '''is''' being treated as a reprimanding a user for mainspace edits. And it doesn't work. Ideally, once a user gets this message, the user should NOT get a reminder/warning/block after this, but this often isn't the case. OFTEN is a key word here. Of course there are people that will ignore those kind of things, but this reminder is ineffective, and something needs to be addressed. <br>{{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 18:38, 4 November 2013 (EST)
I agree. A userspace warning doesn't seem like a warning to me, and if a user is committing a userspace violation, they should receive a standard reminder instead. [[User:Ztar Power|Ztar Power]] ([[User talk:Ztar Power|talk]]) 18:42, 4 November 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 19:42, November 4, 2013

Should this be protected? I don't want a vandal removing all of the content and replacing it with "(insert username here) is a(n) (insert swear word here)".

R.O.B.Remembered Old BuddyROBSSB4EN.png 15:19, 8 April 2011 (EDT)

I totally agree. I shall therefore contact an Admin about this A.S.A.P. PidgeyIcon.pngRandomYoshi(TalkPMsC) 15:10, 25 September 2011 (EDT)

This issue has been resolved months ago. Try not to reply old comments without checking to see if there is still an issue to be resolved.--Knife (talk) 16:00, 29 September 2011 (EDT)

Unfair

I think this is unfair. What's the problem of edit our userspace a time more than the wiki? Some time, we will edit the Wiki again. They don't need to worry. Bro Hammer (TalkCont) 18:51, 4 November 2011 (EDT)

But there are people like this, or users who mostly make excessiveness edits to their userpage, and clog recent changes, and who's mainspace are few and often poor. This is not Facebook or whatever, this is the Super Mario Wiki. Previous Nintendo logo (2006-2016): In 2006, the logo's color scheme was changed from red to gray and the registered symbol was made more smaller.64Fan (Discussion)
Who cares about recent changes. It will not change the wiki at all. Soon, we'll be prohibited of even HAVE an userpage, or making a little typo unintentionally. Bro Hammer (TalkCont) 10:07, 6 November 2011 (EST)

Unfair!!!

I totally agree with Ultra_Fuzzy!!! It's ok when users edit Userspaces twice as Mainspaces, but, it's totally unfair that you receive a warning because you made ONE (Or a few) userspace edit(s) more than Mainspace edits !!! And, don't tell me the wiki would be "poor" if it happens, because a few users editing Userspaces won't ruin the wiki!!! I see that, there are users that seems to edit EVERY single page in the wiki, so, it wouldn't be a problem; Oh, and it doesn't means we're gonna NEVER edit the wiki again! ThePremiumYoshi 10:00, 6 November 2011 (EST)

The point is, editing your userspace means you are focusing on making your userspace look good, and neglecting the mainspace, which is what we are all here for. Regardless of what you say, editing your userspace does affect the mainspace. In small ways at first, like using up time that could be used doing better things, but sooner or later, more users will start and it will get severe. The focus of the wiki will shift from Mario to userpages. That's why we have these rules. Hey there! I'm Marioguy1 :DMarioguy1 (Talk | Contribs) Hey there! I'm Marioguy1 :D

:)

I understand that, but please take a look at Nintendo64fan's Edit Count! He complains about userspace edits, but, he made 446 User talk edits against 288 normal edits!!! He couldn't even post that comment above!!! ThePremiumYoshi 10:40, 6 November 2011 (EST)

I agree. Bro Hammer (TalkCont) 10:42, 6 November 2011 (EST)
I fail to see how Nintendo64fan's editcount has anything to do with the validity of this template. Also could you please not create a new header every time you post a comment. Hey there! I'm Marioguy1 :DMarioguy1 (Talk | Contribs) Hey there! I'm Marioguy1 :D

How much is a "large ratio of userspace to mainspace edits"?

What's the ideal ratio for a userspace warning? Something like 2:1/3:1, more, or less? LBsig.png LB (talkeditsforum) 03:48, 16 March 2013 (EDT)

A ratio shouldn't be how you determine whether to issue a userspace or not. Say if a user made excessive userspace for a long period of time, and then began to focus on mainspace, the ratio will still be there but the user would not deserve a userspace. However, if we reversed that situation, and the user made many mainspace edits over a long period of time, and then they began to make a whole lot of userspace edits, then the ratio wouldn't really be there, but they would deserve a userspace to get them back on track. So basically, don't look at the ratio on their edit counts. Look on the user's recent contributions instead.
'Shroom Spotlight Shokora (talk · edits) 04:08, 16 March 2013 (EDT)
I see, that makes more sense. LBsig.png LB (talkeditsforum) 04:13, 16 March 2013 (EDT)

Effectiveness

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Does this userspace warning actually encourage people to make more edits to the mainspace? I've seen so many users get this warning, it bothers me. I don't think this warning is effective. This, or maybe userspace policy needs to be amended. When people are blocked because they edit their userspace a lot, do they change their behavior or do they tend to continue it? If they change, then the block has done its purpose. If many users have been blocked multiple times simply because of this, then something is not working. After all, a punishment is meant to avert a certain behavior.

Besides, I don't get why people are stressing out over other people's mainspace edit counts when we have a good lot of editors in the first place. I'd be way more concerned if we're a small wiki. Not that I'm discouraging mainspace edits for userspace edits. I just think this "encouragement" is flawed.
Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:48, 4 November 2013 (EST)

Well, editing just your userpage is not what this wiki is about. Having users who edit their user page is no help to this wiki. However big this wiki is, it still needs a lot of help and having users ignore some of the help it it needs in favor of their userpages isn't right. That's why we have all of those restrictions there. MarioWiki is NOT a place purely to socialize and spend most of your time and effort creating userpages, you're supposed to help out with Mario information.
That being said, this template does rarely change user's behaviors but if users continue making userspace edits after the friendly reminder, this puts them on ground for punishment. It's just like some people who keep putting false or misleading information in articles. We HOPE that they may change but this isn't guaranteed, hence why we SHOULD giving them a reminder/warning for blissfully IGNORING what we just notified of them doing. BabyLuigiFire.png Ray Trace(T|C) 18:01, 4 November 2013 (EST)
I never said that this wiki is about editing one's userspace. It isn't. It's all about getting voluntary contributors. But we also shouldn't be criticizing here and there to people that edit their userspace, especially those that are new to wiki editing. The first rung of the wiki editing experience ladder is perhaps an exciting one, and people may be excited to edit their userspace a lot at first (after all, this is what you and I did in the beginning; we, especially I, would've gotten a userspace warning). As you said, this template in general does nothing to encourage people to make more mainspace edits, so why must we have to take the next step to issue a reminder, a warning, and then a block? This just shows that this template is ineffective. This template is being treated as a reprimanding a user for mainspace edits. And it doesn't work. Ideally, once a user gets this message, the user should NOT get a reminder/warning/block after this, but this often isn't the case. OFTEN is a key word here. Of course there are people that will ignore those kind of things, but this reminder is ineffective, and something needs to be addressed.
Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:38, 4 November 2013 (EST)

I agree. A userspace warning doesn't seem like a warning to me, and if a user is committing a userspace violation, they should receive a standard reminder instead. Ztar Power (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2013 (EST)