Talk:Mark: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Mark & Mark) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Are we sure the two Marks are the same? It seems to be the same situation as [[Harry]]: one's in [[Harry (Mario Tennis)|''Mario Tennis'']] and the other is in [[Harry (Mario Golf)|''Mario Golf'']]. Both look completely different from each other and have different traits, which is why they are split, so why isn't this the same with Mark? {{User:Alex95/sig}} 22:11, 23 December 2017 (EST) | Are we sure the two Marks are the same? It seems to be the same situation as [[Harry]]: one's in [[Harry (Mario Tennis)|''Mario Tennis'']] and the other is in [[Harry (Mario Golf)|''Mario Golf'']]. Both look completely different from each other and have different traits, which is why they are split, so why isn't this the same with Mark? {{User:Alex95/sig}} 22:11, 23 December 2017 (EST) | ||
:Situation was brought up in Discord, which led me back to my question here, so... bump. Maybe TPP is necessary? {{User:Alex95/sig}} 18:20, 23 May 2018 (EDT) | :Situation was brought up in Discord, which led me back to my question here, so... bump. Maybe TPP is necessary? {{User:Alex95/sig}} 18:20, 23 May 2018 (EDT) | ||
::Like I said on Discord, I definitely agree with splitting the articles, but I do think it would make sense to have a TPP on it. --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 18:25, 23 May 2018 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:25, May 23, 2018
Mark & Mark
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Are we sure the two Marks are the same? It seems to be the same situation as Harry: one's in Mario Tennis and the other is in Mario Golf. Both look completely different from each other and have different traits, which is why they are split, so why isn't this the same with Mark? 
22:11, 23 December 2017 (EST)
- Situation was brought up in Discord, which led me back to my question here, so... bump. Maybe TPP is necessary? 18:20, 23 May 2018 (EDT)
- Like I said on Discord, I definitely agree with splitting the articles, but I do think it would make sense to have a TPP on it. --
TheFlameChomp (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2018 (EDT)
- Like I said on Discord, I definitely agree with splitting the articles, but I do think it would make sense to have a TPP on it. --
