Category talk:Fawful enemies

Remove from Lookalikes category?

This talk page or section has a conflict or question that must be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

This category is a subcategory of Category:Lookalikes. And yes, the enemies here do look like Fawful. But this proposal redefined "lookalike" to mean "is a copy of another character" (Cloning is more specific, I'm using "copy" from a character design sense.) This should mean none of the enemies in this category qualify as lookalikes, as they are not direct copies of Fawful. Or in shorter terms, Lookalikes are "character + adjective", so anything that qualifies as a Fawful lookalike has to be "Fawful + adjective". Everything in this category is "Enemy + Fawful", a completely different structure. Should "Lookalikes" be removed from this category? Salmancer (talk) 10:14, June 1, 2025 (EDT)

Late reply, but if we did, where would we put it instead? The resemblance to Fawful is still very prominent, and I'm assuming that's probably the reason they weren't removed in the first place. Especially for the enemies that weren't based on a preexisting entity. I'm also surprised there's no Reclusa enemies category yet... Wandering Poplin (talk) 14:18, December 30, 2025 (EST)

It's already in Category:Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story enemies. Does it need any other categories? I don't think so, unless we're considering adding it be in Category:Enemies to account for Minion Quest: The Search for Bowser having Mecha-Fawfuls. Salmancer (talk) 00:01, January 6, 2026 (EST)