User talk:Waluigi Time: Difference between revisions
Waluigi Time (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
I will cease with the edit summary nonsense effective today. But can you let this [[User:Sdman213|user]] know for next time, if someone leaves a message on their talk page, not to be rude and answer them. It also provides assurance that a solution can be reached if there is a problem. I find it ironic that he will respond to other users talk pages but not me. Now that’s not courteous.😒 And I thought maybe someone with higher level experience hear this. {{User:Marino13/sig}} 20:04, May 10, 2023 (EDT) | I will cease with the edit summary nonsense effective today. But can you let this [[User:Sdman213|user]] know for next time, if someone leaves a message on their talk page, not to be rude and answer them. It also provides assurance that a solution can be reached if there is a problem. I find it ironic that he will respond to other users talk pages but not me. Now that’s not courteous.😒 And I thought maybe someone with higher level experience hear this. {{User:Marino13/sig}} 20:04, May 10, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:I have to be honest, I've looked into this (as have a few other admins) and I don't think Sdman has done anything wrong based on our policy. Users aren't required to respond to every message they get, and generally we'll only step in if it's impacting the quality of the wiki (i.e. a user continuing to break rules after being notified, or ignoring attempts to solve an editing dispute). I don't think that line has been crossed here. At most there's a handful of messages asking about reverted edits, but I checked up on those and they were already handled by clear edit summaries anyway. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:13, May 11, 2023 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:13, May 11, 2023
Replies to messages will generally be left on this page, with the exception of time-sensitive issues. If you asked me a question, be sure to check back.
| Archives |
|---|
|
|
Your user page is empty... too empty
Here's a free Wario of the Day to cheer you up!
Oh wait... he's sad too from all the money, dignity, bad breath, and lives I took from him. Mama mia! 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:12, March 31, 2023 (EDT)
Disclaimer: Mario Mart is NOT responsible for the emotional damage the sad broke Wario inflicts on anyone who sees it.
This message is NOT brought to you by ®MarioMart, which is a registered trademark. ©2023
Fw: Free Wario
Looks like I was given a free Wario meant for you, but I couldn't delete it, so all I could do was just forward it via fax. Good thing faxing is still a thing nowadays! Hopefully I didn't make any mistake and sent you TWO of them accidentally. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 20:04, April 3, 2023 (EDT)
- Also FYI that FW (forward) abbreviation being the same as the letters for "Free Wario" was not intended but now I see it and it's funny.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:32, April 3, 2023 (EDT)
FYI...
Here's a free Waluigi derivative! Note the similar pointy mustache and similar romantic demeanor? 
PnnyCrygr 
20:13, April 3, 2023 (EDT)
power-ups
Yoshi can be lost by taking damage, so if Yoshi isn't a power-up, the goomba's shoe isn't either. Goomba's shoe and Yoshi even replace each other based on game style. Pikachu210 (talk) 23:04, April 13, 2023 (EDT)
Age template
I had an idea to update the template, also I updated on Wikipedia a bit. I believe there are more users that born in 1999 than 1989 on this wiki. Which is better, 1972 at time of 1986, or 1999 at time of 2013? Whether the status quo is better? What do you think of changing to Charles Martinet at time of SM64 release date? {{age|September 17, 1955|September 29, 1996}} Since the template is protected and I can't edit right now. Windy (talk) 13:14, May 4, 2023 (EDT)
- It's just an example, so there's not really a point to updating it. Anyway, it's primarily meant for the mainspace, so it doesn't really matter what the average age of our editors are. --
Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 14:45, May 4, 2023 (EDT)
Question
Hey, I was just going to ignore this, but this user is making backhanded comments about me and I'm not entirely sure how to handle the situation. It started when they deleted a message off my talk page that I simply reverted as I want to respect that messages should not be removed from talk pages. I haven't been on much because of other commitments so I simply said on my user page I wasn't editing much. Now every time I made small edits such as in the gallery for Mario + Rabbids Sparks of Hope , [[1]]they [[2]]are [[3]]using edit summaries to call me out on this, when I feel I have not done anything pernsonal to them except ask politely to not remove messages from my talk page. Thanks for your time.
Sdman213 (talk) 11:46, May 10, 2023 (EDT)
- I sent them a message about it to tell them to stop, if it continues please let me or another staff member know. -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 12:13, May 10, 2023 (EDT)
Question 2.0: Courtesy Continued
I will cease with the edit summary nonsense effective today. But can you let this user know for next time, if someone leaves a message on their talk page, not to be rude and answer them. It also provides assurance that a solution can be reached if there is a problem. I find it ironic that he will respond to other users talk pages but not me. Now that’s not courteous.😒 And I thought maybe someone with higher level experience hear this. 
Marino13 20:04, May 10, 2023 (EDT)
- I have to be honest, I've looked into this (as have a few other admins) and I don't think Sdman has done anything wrong based on our policy. Users aren't required to respond to every message they get, and generally we'll only step in if it's impacting the quality of the wiki (i.e. a user continuing to break rules after being notified, or ignoring attempts to solve an editing dispute). I don't think that line has been crossed here. At most there's a handful of messages asking about reverted edits, but I checked up on those and they were already handled by clear edit summaries anyway. -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 12:13, May 11, 2023 (EDT)
