|
|
| (14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| |'''Notice!'''<br>''This talk page is and will only be a discussion regarding either '''me''' or '''something related to the wiki'''.''<br>As such, spam, vandalism, harrassment, and sections that read "What's your favorite character/item/etc.?" and the like '''''<ins>WON'T BE ALLOWED AND WILL BE DELETED ON SIGHT!</ins>''''' (In the case of harrasment, an administrator will be notified ''immediately''.) Regarding this message, let's make this talk page user-friendly!<br>~{{User|Stonehill}} | | |'''Notice!'''<br>''This talk page is and will only be a discussion regarding either '''me''' or '''something related to the wiki'''.''<br>As such, spam, vandalism, harrassment, and sections that read "What's your favorite character/item/etc.?" and the like '''''<ins>WON'T BE ALLOWED AND WILL BE DELETED ON SIGHT!</ins>''''' (In the case of harrasment, an administrator will be notified ''immediately''.) Regarding this message, let's make this talk page user-friendly!<br>~{{User|Stonehill}} |
| |} | | |} |
| {{welcome|Epic Rosalina}}
| | <big>'''''NOTICE: I HAVE STARTED ARCHIVING POSTS. YOU CAN VIEW MY FIRST ARCHIVE AT [[User talk:Stonehill/Archive 1|THIS LINK]].'''''</big> |
|
| |
|
| == <small>(Unnamed Section)</small> ==
| |
|
| |
|
| Hi, although usually, I don't mind if somebody enacted a (talk page) proposal before I get to do it, users tend to appreciate it if you ask them first before doing anything. I've seen some other users get reprimanded for enacting proposals before the proposer can do anything, so it's just a heads-up.
| | ==re:You ought to provide a reason for your proposals== |
|
| |
|
| Nevertheless, thanks for doing the work. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:45, 24 May 2014 (EDT)
| | It's almost like the wall of text directly above provide my position and reasoning, and that anyone who isn't a complete imbecile is able to infer that --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 14:24, 9 June 2015 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| :Okay, sorry, I didn't know. You're welcome, though! [[User:Stonehill|Stonehill]] ([[User talk:Stonehill|talk]]) 17:59, 24 May 2014 (EDT)
| | ==Archive Amount== |
| | | Do you archive every 20 sections? [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 10:41, 25 January 2019 (EST) |
| == Signature test #1 == | |
| | |
| Let's try it. <font face="Stencil">{{color-link-piped|User:Stonehill|#5f9ea0|STONE-HILL!!!}}</font> <sub>'''''[[User talk:Stonehill|At last, the rock fell.]]'''''</sub>
| |
| ''<font color="#c0c0c0">(Tested on 08:25, 6 June 2014 (EDT))</font>''
| |
| | |
| == Signature test #2 ==
| |
| | |
| It should work with the timestamp. <font face="Stencil">{{color-link-piped|User:Stonehill|#5f9ea0|STONE-HILL!!!}}</font> <sub>'''''[[User talk:Stonehill|At last, the rock fell.]]'''''</sub>
| |
| <pre />
| |
| 15:34, 6 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Proposal header ==
| |
| | |
| Do not create an empty proposal section like Archive 40. When the time comes to archive the proposal it will be created then, there is no need for an empty archive. {{User|Yoshi876}} | |
| | |
| Okay, I just wanted to know. <font face="Stencil">{{color-link-piped|User:Stonehill|#5f9ea0|STONE-HILL!!!}}</font> <sub>'''''[[User talk:Stonehill|At last, the rock fell.]]'''''</sub>
| |
| 13:40, 18 June 2014 (EDT)
| |
| == Notice ==
| |
| {{AppealNotice|Pwwnd123|type=reminder}}
| |
| | |
| == RE:About what you did to a sockpuppet's talk page ==
| |
| | |
| You have misread policy, as it states "Extra accounts (sockpuppets) should be blocked indefinitely and their talk pages should be deleted." {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
| :Oops. Sorry about that. <font face="Stencil">{{color-link-piped|User:Stonehill|#5f9ea0|STONE-HILL!!!}}</font> <sub>'''''[[User talk:Stonehill|At last, the rock fell.]]'''''</sub>
| |
| | |
| == Subpage ==
| |
| Friendly reminder: you're not supposed to have any subpage to your userpage. If you wish to keep its content, move it to your userpage, because I think will be deleted soon. (Referring to User:Stonehill/logo) {{User:Tsunami/sig}}
| |
| | |
| == New article ==
| |
| | |
| Hi. When you create an article, please make sure to place all relevant information in it. Is is unacceptable to create an incomplete articles, and there will be consequences if you do it again. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
| | |
| == Re:Deleting section-only notice templates ==
| |
| | |
| Unlike the other templates, {{tem|Stub}} and {{tem|sectionstub}} have different designs beyond just a straight word-swap (different size images, one has a built-in clear function, etc.) so I was just going to leave them both alone. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 18:32, 19 February 2015 (EST)
| |
| | |
| == Proposal ==
| |
| | |
| I'm aware, but thanks anyways. On another note, I noticed that you're using the raw code for your signature (i.e. <code><nowiki><font face="Stencil">{{color-link-piped|User:Stonehill|#5f9ea0|STONE-HILL!!!}}</font> <sub>'''''[[User talk:Stonehill|At last, the rock fell.]]'''''</sub></nowiki></code>). In the future, please refrain from doing this and instead use the subpage you already have (<code>{{[[User:Stonehill/signature]]}}</code>) when signing. You can copy and paste the previous code whenever you'd like to sign, or if you'd like, you can click on the "preferences" tab at the top-right, scroll down to the signature header, fill the box that says "New signature" with <code><nowiki>{{subst:nosubst|User:Stonehill/signature}}</nowiki></code>, and then you can use it simply by typing three tildes <code><nowiki>~~~</nowiki></code>. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}
| |
| :I wouldn't know why that's happening, sorry to say. Try looking through [[Help:Signature]] or asking another experienced user about this. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}
| |
| | |
| == Signature Test #3 ==
| |
| | |
| Test signature. {{User:Stonehill/signature}} <font color="#aaaaaa">(Tested on 15:42, 3 March 2015 (EST))</font>
| |
| | |
| == Re:New message ==
| |
| | |
| No need to message me when you respond on MW:Proposals. I have it on my watchlist and check in whenever I come online. Also (and this is the real reason I'm messaging you), to get the date from showing up in the box when you sign, put the <nowiki><noinclude> on the same line as the sig, rather than skipping a line after </sub></nowiki> - I'm pretty sure that's what's making it go wonky. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 17:48, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| :Okay, got it. {{User:Stonehill/signature}} 18:04, 4 March 2015 (EST)
| |
| | |
| == 'Shroom demo ==
| |
| | |
| Stonehill, I need to write a demo for a 'shroom submission form, and I would like to do the interview part so can I interview you?
| |
| {{User:Toads Forever!/sig}}
| |
| | |
| == Reminder ==
| |
| | |
| {{reminder|2=edit sniping}}
| |
| It was my intention to create the articles for minigames in ''[[Mario Party 10]]''. As per [[MarioWiki:Courtesy]], users should not join in another user's project without asking first. This is edit sniping. {{User:Viper26/sig}}15:34, 27 March 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :I'm going to call unfair on this one. When a new game is released, it would be detrimental to the wiki for only one person to create the articles when there are many others who are capable. If the game has been released for a while and no effort is being made toward it, then sure, shotgun can be called on it. {{User|Yoshi876}}
| |
