User talk:Commander Code-8: Difference between revisions
m (→Proposals Vote!: new section) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Ok :)== | ==Ok :)== | ||
That^ :) --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 15:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | That^ :) --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 15:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Proposals Vote! == | |||
Hello there Commander Code-8! Let me cut to the chase without the formalities, on the Mario Theory proposal, you placed the vote "Per all (but what is this proposal talking about??)". Proposals are not joking matters, these are serious changes and not meant to be joked around with. Official wiki processes should not be fooled with, the Featured Image system had many joke votes and look what happened to it; it didn't work. We wish to keep our proposal process working as it seems to be a good process. So could you change your vote to be serious? (i.e. remove the brackets). If you are serious about that, I don't know why anyone would even think about making an uninformed decision on a proposal and I think that is also a very bad thing. Sorry if I come off as strict but the proposals process is an excelent process and it should not be toyed with. Thanks and keep contributing, {{User|Marioguy1}} | |||
Revision as of 23:30, September 26, 2010
| Please stop Changing the header's organization in the Mario article on the Super Mario Wiki. This isn't a warning, and it's possible that you made a mistake by accident or without realizing it; this is simply a reminder for your information. If the action continues, then a warning will be issued. Thanks for reading and keep contributing. If you feel this reminder was undeserved, you may appeal it. |
Shroom
Thanks for your interest in writing for The 'Shroom. To sign up, you just need to send me a PM in the forums where you write an article as you would do if you were already a writer :) You can choose any of those two, or even both. --
™ The 'Shroom 20:47, 25 April 2010 (EDT)
- You just need to have an account in our forums, and then just click this link. That will take you to the page where you can send me a personal message :) --™ The 'Shroom 15:45, 26 April 2010 (EDT)
- Ok :) There is no hurry. --™ The 'Shroom 15:09, 28 April 2010 (EDT)
- That means you won't write for us, or that you will just write another sections?? If the forum is not working for you we can work something out. --™ The 'Shroom 16:10, 10 May 2010 (EDT)
- Hmm... Ok, if it doesnt work then we can use some other method. --™ The 'Shroom 11:58, 4 June 2010 (EDT)
- Perhaps you can ask Porple why you can't register. --™ The 'Shroom 00:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps you can ask Porple why you can't register. --
- Hmm... Ok, if it doesnt work then we can use some other method. --
- That means you won't write for us, or that you will just write another sections?? If the forum is not working for you we can work something out. --
- Ok :) There is no hurry. --
Nom Delete
Hey, I got your nomination deleted. Sorry about the slow turnaround, but it's totally gone now. . 01:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- I also got the duplicate image deleted. Thanks for notifying me. . 20:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Bramble Scramble
Hey Commander Code-8, can you please check the Bramble Scramble article's nomination page and remove/change your vote. Thanks in advance. Fawfulfury65
Fakeus Newsus
Check your forum PMs. I have sent you all the necessary stuff.
Ok :)
That^ :) --™ The 'Shroom 15:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Proposals Vote!
Hello there Commander Code-8! Let me cut to the chase without the formalities, on the Mario Theory proposal, you placed the vote "Per all (but what is this proposal talking about??)". Proposals are not joking matters, these are serious changes and not meant to be joked around with. Official wiki processes should not be fooled with, the Featured Image system had many joke votes and look what happened to it; it didn't work. We wish to keep our proposal process working as it seems to be a good process. So could you change your vote to be serious? (i.e. remove the brackets). If you are serious about that, I don't know why anyone would even think about making an uninformed decision on a proposal and I think that is also a very bad thing. Sorry if I come off as strict but the proposals process is an excelent process and it should not be toyed with. Thanks and keep contributing, Marioguy1 (talk)
