Talk:Mario Discovery (series)

Why is this a disambiguation page? Shouldn't this be a series page of sorts or something? GreenDisaster 08:48, 14 April 2012 (EDT)

I agree with you, GreenDisaster. Just because it isn't well-known doesn't mean that it should be a disambiguation page. As it should cover a series of games, it should also be moved to Template:Fakelink to maintain consistency. Also, since all three titles linked to on the article as of now appears to begin with "Mario's Early Years!", it must contain an exclamation point as well. RandomYoshi^{(Talk • PMs • C)} 14:07, 14 April 2012 (EDT)

Shouldn't we apply what you just said ? I don't know why it is still marked as an unresolved talk page. By the way, can we rename the page without "approval" in this case ? And why the "(serie)" is necessary ? This the only page who have this name. Sorry for those questions :/ Banon (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2012 (EDT)

I have no real opinion on this but what I meant was that you shouldn't move conjectural names with out a proposal. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)

Ok, thanks to have answered my question :) Banon (talk) 03:56, 1 November 2012 (EDT)

Also yes the (series) is necessary. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)

Fake game ?

Is this a fake game ? It looks like a 3 in 1 game... If it's fake, is the logo edited ? Because it's a good logo for the series.
Banon (talk · edits) 06:17, 11 November 2012 (EST)

I think that may be the uncreated Mario's Early Years! CD-ROM Collection. I'm unfamiliar with the series, but the example seems legit enough.

Shokora (talk · edits) 06:24, 11 November 2012 (EST)