Talk:List of implied species: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:It's really a matter of personal opinion, and since you're taking on the task, I think you should be the one to make the call. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:35, 28 January 2009 (EST) | :It's really a matter of personal opinion, and since you're taking on the task, I think you should be the one to make the call. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:35, 28 January 2009 (EST) | ||
I'll just go ahead and use this page. Thanks for your imput! -- {{User|Booster}} | I'll just go ahead and use this page. Thanks for your imput! -- {{User|Booster}} | ||
:I didn't realize how many implied Pokemon there were! Maybe this page isn't the place for them. -- {{User|Booster}} | |||
Revision as of 02:42, January 29, 2009
Pokemon
Would it be worth putting implied Pokemon in this list? I'm talking about guys like Charmeleon and Wartortle, who are mentioned in trophy descriptions of Pokemon that exist in the Smash Bros. series. -- Booster
- That information should be on the Wiki, like you said. Either be here or on the Pokemon page would probably work. Depending on the amount of information we're talking about, a single section on this page would probably work. Otherwise, what we could do is have an "Implied Pokemon" section on this page and link to the future section in the Pokemon article about implied Pokemon. Does that sound good? Stumpers! 21:13, 28 January 2009 (EST)
Sounds good. I suppose it should go on this page, since they're still only implied, but under a seperate heading or something. Maybe put a link near the bottom of the main Pokemon page or something. -- Booster (talk)
- It's really a matter of personal opinion, and since you're taking on the task, I think you should be the one to make the call. Stumpers! 23:35, 28 January 2009 (EST)
I'll just go ahead and use this page. Thanks for your imput! -- Booster (talk)
