Talk:Giant Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. {{User:Plumber/Pignature}} 22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. {{User:Plumber/Pignature}} 22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. | Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. --[[User:The Qu|The Qu]] 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:43, June 15, 2010
Merge with Donkey Kong, please. We didn't keep the Giant Kirby article, so we can't keep this... I think. My Bloody Valentine
I think we should keep it. Giant DK is a boss, not a simple effect of the Super Mushroom, like Giant Link or Giant Roy. About the Giant Kirby article, it should also be written since he's a boss as well. --Xeze 07:15, 6 February 2008 (EST)
As Xeze said, he's a boss. Even though this is a different form of DK, I think it should stay separate because of the distinctiveness of the subject in discussion. — Stooben Rooben But that's just my opinion.
Per SR. HyperToad
We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. 
22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. --The Qu 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
