MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Geno: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N2/Geno to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Geno: Fix) |
(→Comments: Removing redundant category) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
You know you've reached your limit for Unfa nominations, right? Anyway, I'll try to work on this later when I have some time. {{User|Epic Rosalina}} | You know you've reached your limit for Unfa nominations, right? Anyway, I'll try to work on this later when I have some time. {{User|Epic Rosalina}} | ||
Revision as of 17:30, February 9, 2017
Geno
Remove Featured Article Status
- Time Turner (talk) Regardless of the rewrite template, the intro is far too small, the SMRPG section prattles on about stuff that isn't relevant to the article, bordering on a total synopsis, the article is filled with flowery writing, and, in my opinion, should probably have more information about Geno's special moves.
- Icemario (talk) Per Time Turner.
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Per All.
- Mario (talk) Stuff like "He has an understanding of the bigger picture and the greater consequences of cosmic events." and descriptions can border on repetitive. The personality section is basically, "Geno is obedient, but has responsibility, and it compares to Bowser for some reason. Per all.
- Fandro (talk) Per all.
Keep Featured Article Status
- Epic Rosalina (talk) I've been working on this article for the past 20 minutes, and I fixed every issue addressed; rewrote the page, expanded the intro, and removed all flowery writing! I'd say it looks okay now that I fixed all addressed problems.
- Ashley and Red (talk) Per EpicRosalina. It looks OK now.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
You know you've reached your limit for Unfa nominations, right? Anyway, I'll try to work on this later when I have some time. Epic Rosalina (talk)