MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/New Super Mario Bros.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Wario land 3 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} I SHOULD be able to know what that snail thing was in that ice world without resorting to clicking on a random enemy link or going through all that list of enemies. Put images on that table and I'll retract my vote. | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} I SHOULD be able to know what that snail thing was in that ice world without resorting to clicking on a random enemy link or going through all that list of enemies. Put images on that table and I'll retract my vote. | ||
#{{User|Pwwnd123}} Per Ninelevendo. | #{{User|Pwwnd123}} Per Ninelevendo. | ||
#{{user|Wario land 3}} The whole page looks like a mothaf***ing walktrouth. | #{{user|Wario land 3}} The whole page looks like a mothaf***ing walktrouth. | ||
#{{User|Vommack}} Per Ninelevendo. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
'''Wario land 3''' | |||
#{{User|Vommack}} Because it makes no sense. Is that comment supposed to mean that it has a lot of coverage on the subject? Because if so, that's a '''good''' thing, not a flaw. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 15:15, August 12, 2014
New Super Mario Bros.
Remove Featured Article Status
- Ninelevendo (talk) I know that I seem like I'm trying to Unfeature everything, but lots of theses articles have become outdated. This article is only on Par with New Super Mario Bros. Wii, which is not featured. Although not perfect or complete, New Super Mario Bros. U is better than both of those articles, as the transformations, levels, enemies and basically everything but story and gameplay are better than the sections here. It lacks images and just has layers upon layers of lists that seem somewhat bland and bring down the article. The tables, the things that are meant to help, are inconsistent (Description, How to defeat, function) and lack images. Some of the writing is also obviously to cut trivia (Koopalings? Who cares?) and, speaking of which is that a "you" in the trivia section? So for a great game that starts off a chain reaction of other even better games, this article doesn't make the roots of the other sequels very strong.
- Baby Luigi (talk) I SHOULD be able to know what that snail thing was in that ice world without resorting to clicking on a random enemy link or going through all that list of enemies. Put images on that table and I'll retract my vote.
- Pwwnd123 (talk) Per Ninelevendo.
- Wario land 3 (talk) The whole page looks like a mothaf***ing walktrouth.
- Vommack (talk) Per Ninelevendo.
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Wario land 3
- Vommack (talk) Because it makes no sense. Is that comment supposed to mean that it has a lot of coverage on the subject? Because if so, that's a good thing, not a flaw.
