MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dixie Kong: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== {{UNFANOMSTAT |nominated=20:54, 23 February 2013 |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009)...")
 
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=20:54, 23 February 2013
|nominated=20:54, 23 February 2013
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=20:54, 24 April 2013
|nosupport=false
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
{{User|Yoshi876}} There is a rewrite template on the top of the article
#{{User|Yoshi876}} There is a rewrite template on the top of the article
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} The rewrite template is well-deserved. A very large chunk of the article is sentences that could be written a lot better.
#{{User|King Pikante}} If there is a rewrite template on an article, why should it be featured?


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template.
#{{User|YoshiFan1200}} BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The rewrite template is swiftly corrected and dealt with. If there are any problems concerning with the rewrite template, please elaborate, or we'll be happy to remove it.
#{{User|Toadette and Koopa Bros. Lover}} Per all


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
[[Unfeaturing failure archives|*]]

Latest revision as of 11:59, September 14, 2016

Dixie Kong

Dixie Kong was nominated to be unfeatured at 20:54, 23 February 2013.

Dixie Kong failed unfeaturing requirements at 20:54, 24 April 2013, and is currently able to be renominated.

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. Yoshi876 (talk) There is a rewrite template on the top of the article
  2. GreenDisaster (talk) The rewrite template is well-deserved. A very large chunk of the article is sentences that could be written a lot better.
  3. King Pikante (talk) If there is a rewrite template on an article, why should it be featured?

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Rewrite template is gone. The article itself was terribly written. Not only were there tense errors, but a plethora of comma splices, mentioning of Donkey Kong as "Donkey", continuous misspellings of "where" as "were", and so much else. If only that was the reason of unfeaturing it instead of pointing out there's a rewrite template there and nothing else....nevertheless, I corrected all the major errors that are found BESIDES the ones pointed out by the rewrite template.
  2. YoshiFan1200 (talk) BabyLuigiOnFire corrected the rewrite problem. Also, the article is very large.
  3. LeftyGreenMario (talk) The rewrite template is swiftly corrected and dealt with. If there are any problems concerning with the rewrite template, please elaborate, or we'll be happy to remove it.
  4. Toadette and Koopa Bros. Lover (talk) Per all

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

*

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/Dixie_Kong&oldid=2057011"