Talk:Giant Bowser: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
My opinion here is the same as in the [[Giant DK]] article. Besides, Giant Bowser is a boss in [[Melee]] and in [[New Super Mario Bros]]. So we should keep it. And I'm not saying this just because I wrote this article. --[[User:Xeze|Xeze]] 07:19, 6 February 2008 (EST) | My opinion here is the same as in the [[Giant DK]] article. Besides, Giant Bowser is a boss in [[Melee]] and in [[New Super Mario Bros]]. So we should keep it. And I'm not saying this just because I wrote this article. --[[User:Xeze|Xeze]] 07:19, 6 February 2008 (EST) | ||
I'd say merge. Maybe a proposal is in order? ~~ | |||
Revision as of 10:15, May 9, 2008
Is this article's title conjectural? I know the SSBM deal makes it at least part conjecture... YELLOWYOSHI398
Did you say "Part Conjecture"?
I am Confused 22:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Um... Merge with Bowser??? Max2 (talk)
I definitly say merge...... - Ultimatetoad
Yeah, merging it with Bowser would make a lot of sense. Keep the screenshot though :P - My Bloody Valentine
If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. 
15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
- I'd have to disagee with the merge. Hope I'm not becoming A Link to the Past.
Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back!
I'd say merge. But then again, we do have Giant Baby Bowser.Knife (talk) 17:20, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
I request a merge with Bowser! My Bloody Valentine
My opinion here is the same as in the Giant DK article. Besides, Giant Bowser is a boss in Melee and in New Super Mario Bros. So we should keep it. And I'm not saying this just because I wrote this article. --Xeze 07:19, 6 February 2008 (EST)
I'd say merge. Maybe a proposal is in order? ~~
