MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Culex

Culex

Remove Featured Article Status

1. Randombob-omb4761 (talk) I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, and the final fantasty stuff is spectulation. Were the 2011 users crazy?
2. Ashley and Red (talk) This article doesn't seems to be good. The "alusions to FF series" has speculation (He isn't an Black Mage, Dark Knights REALLY exists in Final Fantasy).

Keep Featured Article Status

1. Tails777 (talk) Length doesn't always matter. We have shorter articles than this one. Plus the quality of the article also counts and I don't see anything wrong with it.
2. bluetoad63 (talk) Per Tails.
3. Waluigi men are as weoseme (talk) This is a extremely high quality page.

Comments

No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. Yoshi876 (talk)

I just got rid of it, on my own. Bluetoad63 13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT)

Bytes =/= article length. Changing the color of the text, for instance, adds bytes without actually increasing article content. So be careful when judging articles by byte size. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:31, 2 April 2014 (EDT)

The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT)

Ok, then User:Ashley and Red/sig

While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. Vommack (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT)

Well, we can't simply remove the information because this stuff important and can explain why Culex seems so unfitting for a Mario character. This is a rare case where we need to explain. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 19:12, 3 April 2014 (EDT)

Mario has a point, it's not likely to be a coincidence this kind of character appears in a Square Enix game. It could be trimmed, possibly. Lord G. matters. 00:26, 4 April 2014 (EDT)