MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Strikers Charged Football: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 29: Line 29:


:Yes, well it does have a great amount of images, and the List of Bonuses in Melee has recently been featured with one image. {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}
:Yes, well it does have a great amount of images, and the List of Bonuses in Melee has recently been featured with one image. {{User|MrConcreteDonkey}}
::But I needs a few more images. Also, that article was a list, and featured lists only need one image. That, and the fact that there is no way you can actually add more images to the article. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}

Revision as of 15:30, June 8, 2010

Mario Strikers Charged Football

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Though it does not seem to have any grammar errors, the article has little images near the bottom and has many short sections. This section is also very short, and can probably be expanded.
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Just because the section is easily fixable doesn't mean anything. This article really needs more screenshots. I don't know why there isn't an expansion template in the card section.

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) This article has all of the images it needs, just look in the characters and sidekicks sections. Plus, they all have excellent quality. All of the needed box-art is at the bottom. The cards section is a minor issue and can be solved easily by anyone who owns them. Plus, hardly any sections are small and cover everything that needs to be in it.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

I see no problems with the sections. All of them show enough information and in depth - Don't look only to the length. On the other hand, the Top Trumps section should go the Merchandise. I see a very few game articles that have these sections about that topic - and are rather short. Coincollector (talk)

I don't think every item deserves its own section. That's one of the problems for me. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

The item section is very inconsistent, too when it comes to images. Only one item gets an image and that's a bob-omb. Plus, are we allowed to use signatures? LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I don't know about sigs. I think we are in the comments, but I could be wrong... Fawfulfury65 (talk)

That image is an example. Also, all the items can be sorted using bullets. Coincollector (talk)

So what if only one item gets an image. All of the item images should be on the item's respective page, not on the article. The only reason the Bob-omb image needs to be there is to give a good example of an item being used. MrConcreteDonkey (talk)

@MrConcreteDonkey: Its a requirement for a FA to have a reasonable amount of images throughout it. Also, the items section looks great now, but the Super Abilities part needs more information. I can add some of that, but I don't know if I can finish it all right now. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Yes, well it does have a great amount of images, and the List of Bonuses in Melee has recently been featured with one image. MrConcreteDonkey (talk)
But I needs a few more images. Also, that article was a list, and featured lists only need one image. That, and the fact that there is no way you can actually add more images to the article. Fawfulfury65 (talk)