MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario 64

Super Mario 64

Support

1. This article looks like it covers all the information on Super Mario 64 and it is also organized well. It contains screenshots and artwork to guide you through this article also. I think it is at featured status overall. File:RPGMarioin3D.PNG Clay Mario File:RPGMarioin3D.PNG
2. Pikax (talk) - I cannot see anything wrong with this article.
3. DaWeegeeMan Per above.
4. Marcelagus (T • C • E) - Thanks to all the people who worked on the storyline etc. while I was gone. It looks pretty good now.
5. It seems like a good article now. I just like to get Luigi into anything I can :) CLICK HERE!

Anywho, I'm now retired here... for good. I do not play on every returning here. I may come again to read, but not to contribute. Here are the reasons I'm gone for good:

• I was more of a liability than an asect here (man I made so many mistakes here...).
• Sometimes my computer has problems with this site (possibly anyway), and I don't have as much computer access as I used to.

If it were just these reasons, I might consider staying. HOWEVER, the next reason is the primary reason I'm leaving:

• Look at how much stuff this wiki has that's not really Mario related: an article for every SSB stage, item, character, assist trophy, etc., etc. Heck, there's even an article for Rope Snake. This wiki also goes into too much info other cross-overs. I'M SICK OF HOW MUCH THIS WIKI TREATS NON-MARIO THINGS LIKE THEY'RE MARIO THINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111111ONEONEONE

Oppose

#I noticed something that I believe should be added to this article. Although Luigi didn't appear in this game, there many rumors that he did, fueled by the fact that in the courtyard there is a blurry sign that says "L is real 2041". I believe something needs to be added about that. For more information look at Super Mario 64 on wikipedia section Rumors. WK

Comments

I like the article but the gallery is not good. The boo and lakitu pictures are from Mario Kart Super Circuit and there are way too many pictures of Mario, Bowser, etc. I didn't wanna oppose this because everything else is fine. Z3r0 Tw0

I didn't see any images of lakitu, but I have to admit, some of the images, especially the 1-up mushroom and the coloured blocks aren't as good quality as they perhaps could be. Pikax (talk)

This article was once nominated before, but was denied for a what would be invalid vote today. There is no problem with the gallery, as all pictures are different from one another, and all are official. Ill also look into the problem about the artwork from other games, and fix that as soon as possible. "Too much Mario & Bowser" is (as of now) allowed. Also, about the quality, thats the best anyone could find, so if you can find better, then go ahead. Better to have bad quality than no quality. Marcelagus (T • C • E)

Which is why I am not opposing - if there aren't any better quality images, I have nothing to say against the article. Pikax (talk) 08:38, 15 July 2008 (EDT)

Nevermind my comment. Someone has removed them. I can honestly say that! But I do like the article! Z3r0 Tw0

White Knight: Everything about the whole Luigi rumour is fan-based, and is just assumptions. Wikipedia might do that kind of stuff, but MarioWiki doesn't. In fact, I'm pretty sure we did used to have a section for the Luigi and the Fountain rumour, but was removed, for... well, the reasons I just stated. Marcelagus (T • C • E)

Starry Parakarry - Hey, WhiteKnight! I added that little rumor thing, so uh, yeah! Please try to change your opposal soon!

Thank you Starry Parakarry. I was actually thinking of a whole section labeld rumors instead of just something added to the trivia, but that is good. I will change my oppose to support. WK