Talk:X-Ship: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--~~~~) |
(→Rename: new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--{{User|Knife}} 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST) | If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--{{User|Knife}} 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST) | ||
:Many articles are named with conjectured titles, yet we maintain them. But, considering the shortness of this example, we could probably merge it to either [[Lord Crump]]'s or the [[X-Naut]] page (I favor the latter). [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 18:13, 18 December 2009 (EST) | |||
::Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--{{User|Knife}} 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST) | |||
:::My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST) | |||
::::Definitely. But, seeing as the ship belongs to Lord Crump, not the X-Nauts, I think it should be merged with Lord Crump. {{User:Dry Paratroopa/sig}} | |||
== Rename == | |||
{{talk}} | |||
This seems like an overly flashy name in my opinion. Even "X-Naut ship" would be better. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:33, December 28, 2023 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:33, December 28, 2023
If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--Knife (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Many articles are named with conjectured titles, yet we maintain them. But, considering the shortness of this example, we could probably merge it to either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page (I favor the latter). Redstar 18:13, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--Knife (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. Redstar 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Definitely. But, seeing as the ship belongs to Lord Crump, not the X-Nauts, I think it should be merged with Lord Crump. User:Dry Paratroopa/sig
- My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. Redstar 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--Knife (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST)
Rename[edit]
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
This seems like an overly flashy name in my opinion. Even "X-Naut ship" would be better. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:33, December 28, 2023 (EST)
