MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong

From the Super Mario Wiki

Kiddy Kong[edit]

Remove Featured Article Status[edit]

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) Per Thoth.
  2. Thoth (talk) The article is riddled with minor grammatical errors, has non-canonical information, and seems more like a fanfic than an article in some places. It's a good article, but I don't think it's good enough to be featured.

Keep Featured Article Status[edit]

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) For a character who only appeared in one original game and one comic appearance, this article is simply amazing when it comes to the information. Sure, I'm not sure about the quality of the information (some FAs actually have bad quality writing that I corrected in the past) and I'm not sure if I proofread it yet, but nevertheless, this article still deserves title of featured. Everything that needs to be an FA, this article has it all.
  2. MrConcreteDonkey (talk) - Per BLOF. It doesn't matter if he only appeared once, the article is very well written (for a character who only appeared once, that is).
  3. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per my comments.
  4. CalebArisas (talk) - What is wrong about this article? It is perfectly fine, and is loaded with the information you want. Per all. This article stays featured.
  5. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I really do not see anything seriously wrong here. This article has the quality of a featured article.
  6. Magikrazy51 (talk) For a character whose only been in two games, a remake and a German comic, it's pretty good.
  7. Catboy41 (talk) Per all.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]

Comments[edit]

He is one character who appeared in one game. I mean I love him, but there is not a lot of information in the article.--DiddyKongfan020899

He actually appeared in more than one game. But how notable he is does not matter. The article has a great amount of info. It tells you all his abilities, his personality, his appearances, etc. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

@DKPetey: It doesn't have to be as big as the SSBB article to be featured. It's long enough, has everything it needs, and follows all of the standards for a FA. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

DKPetey: Who are you referring to? I'll add everything necessary to make your vote, er, count. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Look, here's the template you're supposed to make the "Removal of Support/Oppose Votes" just to clear things up:
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
;{{User|Username of vote you want to remove}}
#{{User|Your username}} - Reason on removal

BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

@FF65, yeah just keep it featured! DKPetey99 18:09, 31 March 2011 (EDT)

You should have let the proposal die DX LeftyGreenMario (talk)

@LeftyGreenMario, how can I let it die? DKPetey99 (talk)

You leave it unedited for a month. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
@FireMario: You have to add a valid reason soon or the thing will not be unfeatured. Marioguy1 (talk)

Thoth: Please read here. Nintendo has not established an official canon so the line between canon and non-canon is not defined. We are forced to cover every official appearance. Canon arguments are still going and we have to cover everything to be as neutral as we can. LeftyGreenMario (talk)