Talk:Mad Big Boo

Merge Mad Big Boo with Mad Boo

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Friday, May 17, 2024, 09:27 GMT

I say we merge them for the only sole reason that both of them are stubs and combineing them wouldn't be a bad idea.

Proposer: Zero777 (talk)
Deadline: 19 July, 2010 23:59

Support

Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Per proposal. Zero signing out
NARCE (talk)

Oppose

KS3 (talk) Per LGM's comment, and if we merged Big Boo into Boo then we have to merge all the subspecies into their respective species' articles
Walkazo (talk) - Per KS3 and LGM. Different species deserve different articles, even if they are stubs.
Pseudo-dino (talk) - Per all.

Comment

Then shouldn't that mean that Big Boo and Boo should be merged also? It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 22:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I am Zero! Alright, get this straight, I said we merge them because they are both stubs, not because they are the same species. Zero signing out. Zero777 (talk)

I disagree with LGM. Big Boo is the leader of the Boos in Super Mario 64 in case you didn't know. You see how long the Big Boo Article is on its own? I don't think it should be merged with the regular Boo articles.

Ray Trace^(T|C)

I am Zero! I'm trying to merge the Mad Big Boo article with the Mad Boo article because they are both stubs. Zero signing out.

BoobyLoonsOspreyFalcon, Big Boo behaves like a big boo in the games. Mad Big Boo behaves like a mad, big boo. I'm not saying that Big Boo should be merged with Boo, but if we merge Mad Boo and Mad Big Boo, then it should make sense to merge Boo and Big Boo for consistency. And besides, merging stubs because they are stubs isn't a very good reason. I don't want stubs either, though.

It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)