Talk:Gnat Attack: Difference between revisions
m (→Comments) |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
===Split=== | ===Split=== | ||
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - No matter how minor the enemies are, they are enemies nonetheless and therefore require articles as all enemies do. | #{{User|Marioguy1}} - No matter how minor the enemies are, they are enemies nonetheless and therefore require articles as all enemies do. | ||
#{{User|Reversinator}} Per Marioguy1. | |||
===Leave Merged=== | ===Leave Merged=== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
But wouldn't this create more stubs {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | But wouldn't this create more stubs {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | ||
:Not exactly, a stub is an article in which all the information is not present, true it would create short articles, but the articles would have all information present and would therefore not be stubs. {{User|Marioguy1}} | :Not exactly, a stub is an article in which all the information is not present, true it would create short articles, but the articles would have all information present and would therefore not be stubs. {{User|Marioguy1}} | ||
The enemies were previously split before, though the proposal was on a talk page and that talk page has been deleted. Just thought I'd say that. | |||
Revision as of 08:14, April 11, 2011
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Fly Assault Game's Boss
It seems really unlikely that the comics would just refer to a boss as "Fly Assault Game's Boss". That's like saying that Mario's name is "Famous Nintendo Character". Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Maybe the author of the manga didn't know Watinga's name. But that hardly counts as a name, one could also say that Watinga was unnamed in the manga. Anyway, I don't have the book, so I can't check it. --Grandy02 17:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Split Enemies from Gnat Attack
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Thursday, May 2, 2024, 01:08 GMT
The enemies section of this article is not how a usual enemies section should look; it has all enemies within it. These enemies are unique enemies, they have their own quirks, their own methods of destruction, and there is even a boss character in there! All of the enemies in that enemies section should be split out into their own articles; as they are valid enemies, even if they had minor appearances.
I also have here a quote from the coverage policy:
- “All content from games in [Mario-related spin-off] series is allowed on the wiki”
- —MarioWiki:Coverage
These enemies are part of the game, they are content, they are allowed.
Proposer: Marioguy1 (talk)
Deadline: 24 April, 2011 23:59 GMT
Split
- Marioguy1 (talk) - No matter how minor the enemies are, they are enemies nonetheless and therefore require articles as all enemies do.
- Reversinator (talk) Per Marioguy1.
Leave Merged
Comments
But wouldn't this create more stubs Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- Not exactly, a stub is an article in which all the information is not present, true it would create short articles, but the articles would have all information present and would therefore not be stubs. Marioguy1 (talk)
The enemies were previously split before, though the proposal was on a talk page and that talk page has been deleted. Just thought I'd say that.
