Talk:Empty Block: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
RandomYoshi (talk | contribs) m (→Another Name) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
"Used Block" is fine, but I think "Empty Block" would be better, since say that the block is empty is more understandable than say that it is used. {{User:Ultra Koopa/Sig}} 12:16, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | "Used Block" is fine, but I think "Empty Block" would be better, since say that the block is empty is more understandable than say that it is used. {{User:Ultra Koopa/Sig}} 12:16, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
:I can see what you are saying here, actually. Since not all Used Blocks have been 'used' by Mario/Luigi before getting to this phrase, 'Empty Block' makes more sense in context. Don't rename it yet, though, because some people may disagree with you. {{User:RandomYoshi/sig}} 12:58, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | :I can see what you are saying here, actually. Since not all Used Blocks have been 'used' by Mario/Luigi before getting to this phrase, 'Empty Block' makes more sense in context. Don't rename it yet, though, because some people may disagree with you. {{User:RandomYoshi/sig}} 12:58, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
::These types of article names are on a first come first serve basis {{User|Raven Effect}} |
Revision as of 13:04, March 14, 2012
Is this even considered official? :| RAP... That name sounds pretty unofficial to the wiki... :|
- No. That's why I put the "conjecture" template on it. I was gonna request a deletion, but... — Stooben Rooben 21:57, 13 May 2008 (EDT)
I for one feel this page is unnecessary. Any other opinions? Phoenix Rider 03:58, 17 August 2009 (EDT)
- I think it's fine. Those Blocks are common gameplay elements in the Mario series. Time Questions 07:15, 17 August 2009 (EDT)
Refill
Anyway, does used block is refillable?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by FayyazMurmur (talk).
- Has Nintendo ever addressed the issue? If not, then we need not worry about reporting it on the article. · SMB (Talk) · 23:54, 15 May 2010 (EDT)
Another Name
"Used Block" is fine, but I think "Empty Block" would be better, since say that the block is empty is more understandable than say that it is used.
12:16, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
- I can see what you are saying here, actually. Since not all Used Blocks have been 'used' by Mario/Luigi before getting to this phrase, 'Empty Block' makes more sense in context. Don't rename it yet, though, because some people may disagree with you. RandomYoshi( • PMs • ) 12:58, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
- These types of article names are on a first come first serve basis Raven Effect (talk)