Talk:Cataquack: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Marcelagus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::The TV series (in the episode, [[The Bird! The Bird!]]) - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 19:00, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ::The TV series (in the episode, [[The Bird! The Bird!]]) - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 19:00, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::Oh, I thought you meant a GAME as in, like, actually "official". Forget it then, Birdo's not a Bird. [[User:Garlic Man|Garlic Man]] | |||
Revision as of 19:23, August 27, 2008
Is it just me, or do these guys look like a single segment of a Wiggler with added bill and tail? --Someone Else 11:03, 23 November 2007 (EST)
They do, but why are you asking? Mr. Guy the Guy
Talk!
Eh, I don't know... It was just an observation. --Someone Else
Is there any proof that Cataquacks are birds? Other than a duck-like bill, they have no other bird-like features. 1337Yoshi
- Whoever said they were bir... *sees Bird template* What's this doing here? *removes* Marcelagus (T • C • E)
- The name implies they're meant to be birds, and unlike Birdos they have beaks... First-impressions-wise, they seem like freakish ducks, and I think it would be more appropritate to include them in the Bird Template than to totally exclude that possibility. - Walkazo 00:25, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
- Hmm... now that I think of it, they do have "quack" in their names, but it's just a possiblity/assumption nontheless. Nothing official yet. Are mutant bird-looking creatures still birds? Marcelagus (T • C • E)
- True, but are giant, fire-breathing demons whith spiked shelles still turtles? If Nintendo's willing to make that sorta stretch for Bowser (and all the other "turtles"), they probably view Cataquaks in the same light. - Walkazo 17:13, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- Per Walkazo. All Birds dont fly... The Writing Guy 17:16, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- If Nintendo says Bowser is a turtle, we know Bowser is a turtle. If nintendo doesn't say Cataquacks are ducks... we do not know if they are ducks. End of story... Marcelagus (T • C • E)
- Per Walkazo. All Birds dont fly... The Writing Guy 17:16, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- True, but are giant, fire-breathing demons whith spiked shelles still turtles? If Nintendo's willing to make that sorta stretch for Bowser (and all the other "turtles"), they probably view Cataquaks in the same light. - Walkazo 17:13, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- Hmm... now that I think of it, they do have "quack" in their names, but it's just a possiblity/assumption nontheless. Nothing official yet. Are mutant bird-looking creatures still birds? Marcelagus (T • C • E)
- The name implies they're meant to be birds, and unlike Birdos they have beaks... First-impressions-wise, they seem like freakish ducks, and I think it would be more appropritate to include them in the Bird Template than to totally exclude that possibility. - Walkazo 00:25, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
Though official sources said Birdos were birds, they're still not birds - take what they say with a grain of salt and make judgement calls when necessary; this needs a judgement call. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, its a duck (that's an old proverb, btw). Anyway I'm not saying we should go writing about how they're birds in the article, but I think they should be put back on the Template for navigation's sake. - Walkazo 18:40, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- What "official source" ever said Birdos were Birds? Marcelagus (T • C • E)
- The TV series (in the episode, The Bird! The Bird!) - Walkazo 19:00, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
- Oh, I thought you meant a GAME as in, like, actually "official". Forget it then, Birdo's not a Bird. Garlic Man
- The TV series (in the episode, The Bird! The Bird!) - Walkazo 19:00, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
