Talk:Axem Rangers: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(Response.)
Line 19: Line 19:
:::::::It is not as if Iwata looks over the guides NoA makes. It's no different from one staff member's review in NP. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] 14:31, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::::It is not as if Iwata looks over the guides NoA makes. It's no different from one staff member's review in NP. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] 14:31, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
::::::::It still is officially created by Nintendo, regardless of who approves it. If Nintendo wanted to control such information, they would. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
::::::::It still is officially created by Nintendo, regardless of who approves it. If Nintendo wanted to control such information, they would. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
:::::::::That's "if". They don't. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] 14:34, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:34, May 7, 2007

Each Axem Ranger, as an individual character, deserves an article. They do act independently - each has their own stats and attacks. The articles will not be merged, and it's not a big deal that they are seperate but shorter. -- Son of Suns

I agreee they should be kept seperate. Great Gonzo
You know what's funny? It actually IS a big deal that they are short and will never be more than a stub. If you can't make the articles larger without adding guide content, then how are you going to validate them having an article? On top of that, I did indeed consult with Wayoshi, who appears to be of importance in the community of the Super Mario Wiki. - A Link to the Past 14:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Yes but so is Son of Suns and I, and we both appear to oppose this merge, there is potential here. Great Gonzo
Question is, will you bother to exercise that potential? On top of that, focus on forming some criteria for inclusion. - A Link to the Past 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

Guide content is fine as long as it is official. Those articles have potential. And Wayoshi does not speak for the entire wiki - he is one member of a greater community. -- Son of Suns

Why is it fine? This isn't a guide. - A Link to the Past 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
The Mariowiki is a knowlege base contain all sorts of iinformation as long as its true. Great Gonzo
So would it be appropriate to assess the difficulty of the Axem Rangers? - A Link to the Past 14:24, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Only if an official guide did. -- Son of Suns
Not even then. If someone feels that it's not difficult, what should be done? A guide is only good as a source for certain facts - any mention of difficulty is the opinion of one writer. - A Link to the Past 14:27, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
Nintendo did not have to release such opinions or information, but they did. It is the opinon of Nintendo as a whole, not one writer. -- Son of Suns
It is not as if Iwata looks over the guides NoA makes. It's no different from one staff member's review in NP. - A Link to the Past 14:31, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
It still is officially created by Nintendo, regardless of who approves it. If Nintendo wanted to control such information, they would. -- Son of Suns
That's "if". They don't. - A Link to the Past 14:34, 7 May 2007 (EDT)