MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Yoshi's Island DS: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Glowsquid's reason in 2013)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
 
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=19:26 2 June, 2013
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
# {{User|Mario7}} This game was jus featured on May 11, 2013
# {{User|Mario7}} This game was jus featured on May 11, 2013
Line 12: Line 7:
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Ok, so what else? Wait, NOTHING else? That's all you have to say is a obvious fact that occurred weeks ago? No criticisms? No pointing out any flaws? Did you even read what disqualifies an article for featured status?
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Ok, so what else? Wait, NOTHING else? That's all you have to say is a obvious fact that occurred weeks ago? No criticisms? No pointing out any flaws? Did you even read what disqualifies an article for featured status?
#{{User|A Paragoomba and the Koopa Bros.}} Per all, this is very pointless.
#{{User|A Paragoomba and the Koopa Bros.}} Per all, this is very pointless.
#{{User|YoshiKong}} &ndash; Per all.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
Line 25: Line 21:
Is it possible to remove a featuring/unfeaturing proposal? If so, this should be removed. {{User|Mr. Game & Watch}}
Is it possible to remove a featuring/unfeaturing proposal? If so, this should be removed. {{User|Mr. Game & Watch}}
:I seem to remember the Megasparkle Goomba nomination failing on the day it was nominated, so it might be. {{User|Yoshi876}}
:I seem to remember the Megasparkle Goomba nomination failing on the day it was nominated, so it might be. {{User|Yoshi876}}
[[Category:Unfeaturing failure archives]]

Latest revision as of 19:19, February 9, 2017

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. Mario7 (talk) This game was jus featured on May 11, 2013

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. Yoshi876 (talk) The date an article was featured has nothing to do with its quality, and it has the quality for an FA.
  2. Baby Luigi (talk) Ok, so what else? Wait, NOTHING else? That's all you have to say is a obvious fact that occurred weeks ago? No criticisms? No pointing out any flaws? Did you even read what disqualifies an article for featured status?
  3. A Paragoomba and the Koopa Bros. (talk) Per all, this is very pointless.
  4. YoshiKong (talk) – Per all.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Mario7

  1. Baby Luigi (talk) No offense, but this is the stupidest, most invalid reason for ever unfeaturing an article. As Yoshi876 said, I have no idea what the date of an article has to do with the quality of it being unfeatured.
  2. Yoshi876 (talk) Per Baby Luigi, no valid reason to unfeature.
  3. Mr. Game & Watch (talk) Per all.
  4. Mario4Ever (talk) Per Yoshi876.
  5. A Paragoomba and the Koopa Bros. (talk) Per all.
  6. Banon (talk) We should unfeature every article because they have been featured some time ago. Oh wait...

Comments

Is it possible to remove a featuring/unfeaturing proposal? If so, this should be removed. Mr. Game & Watch (talk)

I seem to remember the Megasparkle Goomba nomination failing on the day it was nominated, so it might be. Yoshi876 (talk)