MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Party 9

Mario Party 9

Remove featured article status

1. Time Turner (talk) The critical reception section has a rewrite-expand template, the minigame section has no information tied to it, the supporting characters section can easily be elaborated upon, and the references are poorly cited. I also haven't played Mario Party 9 in a while, but I believe that the "Solo mode", "Museum", and "Extras" sections could be expanded with more information, since they look rather lacking currently.
2. Baby Luigi (talk) Until these problems are fixed, especially the jarring, ugly rewrite template, I'll be voting to remove it. That is, unless me (or even someone else) finds time to fix those problems, which would be very appreciated.
3. Toadette the Achiever (talk) I don't think I can fix this either; yeah, maybe someone else should have a look at the reception section. (Consider our votes a hint to look at that section and see if YOU can solve the issue!)
4. TheFlameChomp (talk) I'll vote to unfeature it unless the critical reception section is expanded.

Keep featured article status

1. Skuchi037 (talk) I honestly have to oppose this. I think I know how to improve that section, but I'll have to take a look at it. Anyway, it's still a game in the series, and should be available for everyone to see. As for your comment, Baby Luigi (talk), I think I have time to fix the problems you mentioned. As soon as I take a look at it, I'll be on the job.

Removal of support/oppose votes

Skuchi037

1. Yoshi876 (talk) It's been several weeks, and nothing's been done. Start a vote removal process so this nomination can take due course.

Comments

I'm not sure, perhaps look at Wikipedia's page on Mario Party 9 as a guide to improve the section? ^(T|C) 17:59, 1 June 2017 (EDT)

I have the general idea of how it should look like. See Mario Party: Star Rush. Ray Trace^(T|C) 18:02, 1 June 2017 (EDT)

I added a table with reference to the one in Star Rush. Not sure if directly copying a whole paragraph of a review is appreciated.--Mr.L 1998(talk) 06:39, 5 June 2017 (EDT)

I think the amount of data is sufficient now. What we need now is a summary of the reviews. Also, should we give the Jackpot Space (Section above Critical Reception) an image?--Mr.L 1998(talk) 15:35, 9 June 2017 (EDT)