MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Count Bleck: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User|Pikax}} I see nothing wrong with this article at all. | #{{User|Pikax}} I see nothing wrong with this article at all. | ||
#It's nicely written and it has a lot of detail. Its pretty big too, for a boss thats only been in one game. I say why not? {{user:Luigi001/sig}} | #It's nicely written and it has a lot of detail. Its pretty big too, for a boss thats only been in one game. I say why not? {{user:Luigi001/sig}} | ||
#I throw my full support and support. SUPPORT!-[[User:Squirps|Squirps]] 12:50, 28 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Revision as of 12:50, June 28, 2008
Count Bleck
Support
Very well written and detailed, especially for a "character of the game" article.
Glitz
Hawk Per Plumber. Besides, he is a major villain, after all.- Pikax (talk) I see nothing wrong with this article at all.
- It's nicely written and it has a lot of detail. Its pretty big too, for a boss thats only been in one game. I say why not?
Z3r0 Tw0
- I throw my full support and support. SUPPORT!-Squirps 12:50, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
Oppose
Comments
I think that 2 or 3 more images wouldn't hurt. --Grandy02 13:53, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, it definitely needs more pictures. The main antagonist definitely has to have more pictures than just two. What about the scene with Dimentio and the Chaos Heart? What about his Catch Card picture? 
Starry Parakarry 
- The named scene has been added yesterday. The Catch Card picture doesn't show more than the artwork already does. 1 or 2 more images and the article might get my support. --Grandy02 06:31, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
I added two more images; I think that should do it.-Darknessofheart
