MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Castle Bleck: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Castle Bleck moved to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Castle Bleck: meh, I'll just go with numbering the failed nominations N1, N2, etc.)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
'''Castle Black was nominated for FA at 01:00, 15 January 2010, and failed at 16:44, 7 March 2010.'''
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. -->20:00, 14 January 2010 (EST)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Ralphfan}} &ndash; I think it is a very descriptive and well-written article.
#{{User|Ralphfan}} &ndash; I think it is a very descriptive and well-written article.

Revision as of 11:44, March 14, 2010

Castle Black was nominated for FA at 01:00, 15 January 2010, and failed at 16:44, 7 March 2010.

Castle Bleck

Support

  1. Ralphfan (talk) – I think it is a very descriptive and well-written article.

Oppose

  1. Reversinator (talk) Greatly lacking in images.
  2. Byllant (talk) Per Reversinator.
  3. MATEOELBACAN (talk) Per Reversinator.
  4. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Only a whopping ONE image in the whole article? Wow. Per Reversinator.
  5. Red Shell 68066vr (talk) someone needs to add more images. and per the green mario that is left handed.

Removal of Opposes

Comments