Talk:Machine Made: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(→Split?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'm not 100% on this, but the article comes off as rather... unfocused due to covering several different respawning minibosses and their respective flunkies. It is made almost entirely of statistics, and as of this comment, the remake's haven't even been added to double its length. This may benefit from being split into each type (or fully integrated with their respective "normal" counterpart) and turned into more of a disambiguation. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:10, November 22, 2023 (EST) | I'm not 100% on this, but the article comes off as rather... unfocused due to covering several different respawning minibosses and their respective flunkies. It is made almost entirely of statistics, and as of this comment, the remake's haven't even been added to double its length. This may benefit from being split into each type (or fully integrated with their respective "normal" counterpart) and turned into more of a disambiguation. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 00:10, November 22, 2023 (EST) | ||
:I think merging to the normal counterparts makes the most sense, since their names in the Monster List follow the format "<name> (Machine Made)". [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 06:53, November 22, 2023 (EST) | :I think merging to the normal counterparts makes the most sense, since their names in the Monster List follow the format "<name> (Machine Made)". [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 06:53, November 22, 2023 (EST) | ||
::Personally speaking, I think they should be split into separate articles. I think they're more comparable to stronger/other variants of enemies, like R enemies in ''Mario & Luigi: Dream Team''. They have their own individual stats different from their base versions and a different color scheme. I think splitting them individually would keep them consistent with other RPG enemies. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 17:36, December 20, 2023
Split?
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
I'm not 100% on this, but the article comes off as rather... unfocused due to covering several different respawning minibosses and their respective flunkies. It is made almost entirely of statistics, and as of this comment, the remake's haven't even been added to double its length. This may benefit from being split into each type (or fully integrated with their respective "normal" counterpart) and turned into more of a disambiguation. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 00:10, November 22, 2023 (EST)
- I think merging to the normal counterparts makes the most sense, since their names in the Monster List follow the format "<name> (Machine Made)". Blinker (talk) 06:53, November 22, 2023 (EST)
- Personally speaking, I think they should be split into separate articles. I think they're more comparable to stronger/other variants of enemies, like R enemies in Mario & Luigi: Dream Team. They have their own individual stats different from their base versions and a different color scheme. I think splitting them individually would keep them consistent with other RPG enemies.
Tails777 Talk to me!
- Personally speaking, I think they should be split into separate articles. I think they're more comparable to stronger/other variants of enemies, like R enemies in Mario & Luigi: Dream Team. They have their own individual stats different from their base versions and a different color scheme. I think splitting them individually would keep them consistent with other RPG enemies.
