MarioWiki:Featured articles/N3/Super Mario 3D World: Difference between revisions

m
Switching oppose to support.
(I think everything has been fixed. Only 1 day, 5 hours, and 5 minutes left before this expires. We need to be quick)
m (Switching oppose to support.)
Line 7: Line 7:
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{user|Supermariofan67}} - This article is very well-written, has no red links, and has a lot of info.
#{{user|Supermariofan67}} - This article is very well-written, has no red links, and has a lot of info.
#{{user|Owencrazyboy9}} - Per Supermariofan67.


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} The list of enemies, bosses, and objects irk me. I strongly believe that enemies here may need visual representations of themselves, because the average viewer may not know what a Splounder or a Flopter looks like because the enemy is never named in game and it forces viewers to click on a lot of articles until they finally get a visual picture of the character from clicking on the correct article or a name-guess. Besides, other featured articles list their enemies and objects, namely the ''Donkey Kong Country'' series articles, an example being ''[[Donkey Kong Country 2: Diddy's Kong Quest]]''. Addutionally, the reception section is half-assed, with no table, no Metacritic score, and some weasel-worded like criticisms, like its second, unsourced paragraph. Also, the gameplay paragraph can be rewritten. Having some enemies from Super Mario World, for example, does not exactly constitute as "elements from Super Mario World making a return". The gameplay section goes to great lengths explaining what makes a return from what previous game, when its priority is to first explain the general gameplay of how Mario functions; there's always first time viewers who may not know prior Mario information so this confuses potential first time readers and forces them to jump all over the wiki to know the full context of games. Therefore, that general gameplay should be talked about first, how the game plays, how Mario works, THEN it should list if those said elements of this game originate from a previous Mario game.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} The list of enemies, bosses, and objects irk me. I strongly believe that enemies here may need visual representations of themselves, because the average viewer may not know what a Splounder or a Flopter looks like because the enemy is never named in game and it forces viewers to click on a lot of articles until they finally get a visual picture of the character from clicking on the correct article or a name-guess. Besides, other featured articles list their enemies and objects, namely the ''Donkey Kong Country'' series articles, an example being ''[[Donkey Kong Country 2: Diddy's Kong Quest]]''. Addutionally, the reception section is half-assed, with no table, no Metacritic score, and some weasel-worded like criticisms, like its second, unsourced paragraph. Also, the gameplay paragraph can be rewritten. Having some enemies from Super Mario World, for example, does not exactly constitute as "elements from Super Mario World making a return". The gameplay section goes to great lengths explaining what makes a return from what previous game, when its priority is to first explain the general gameplay of how Mario functions; there's always first time viewers who may not know prior Mario information so this confuses potential first time readers and forces them to jump all over the wiki to know the full context of games. Therefore, that general gameplay should be talked about first, how the game plays, how Mario works, THEN it should list if those said elements of this game originate from a previous Mario game.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} I agree with Baby Luigi.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} I agree with Baby Luigi.
#{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} Per both. Other than those major issues, everything else on the article is written nicely. It's just that those major sections are causing me to oppose.
#{{User|Boo4761}} Large amounts of the article are lists. If we change those to what Baby Luigi said, maybe it could be worthy of featured status.
#{{User|Boo4761}} Large amounts of the article are lists. If we change those to what Baby Luigi said, maybe it could be worthy of featured status.
#{{User|Alex95}} The whole article seems very overdone. The enemy list is expansive; other articles just have a simple list of the enemies. And it feels like there are ''two'' lists of usable power-ups, with both the transformations and items listing the same power-ups. The article has a lot of information, yes, but there is such a thing as too much information. In other words, per Baby Luigi.
#{{User|Alex95}} The whole article seems very overdone. The enemy list is expansive; other articles just have a simple list of the enemies. And it feels like there are ''two'' lists of usable power-ups, with both the transformations and items listing the same power-ups. The article has a lot of information, yes, but there is such a thing as too much information. In other words, per Baby Luigi.
#{{User|PinkYoshiFan}} My new oppose is that the tables make it super long, which is annoying and per Baby Luigi
#{{User|PinkYoshiFan}} My new oppose is that the tables make it super long, which is annoying and per Baby Luigi
<s>#{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} Per both. Other than those major issues, everything else on the article is written nicely. It's just that those major sections are causing me to oppose.</s>


==== Removal of opposes ====
==== Removal of opposes ====
Line 21: Line 22:


=====TheFlameChomp=====
=====TheFlameChomp=====
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} I think everything has been fixed.
=====Owencrazyboy9=====
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} I think everything has been fixed.
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} I think everything has been fixed.


8,477

edits