User talk:Time Turner/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
m (Glowsquid moved page User talk:GreenDisaster to User talk:Time Turner: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "GreenDisaster" to "Time Turner")
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 83: Line 83:


==Why?==
==Why?==
Why are you erasing my enemy log? I barely get to contribut, since everything I know gets deleted, or considered not necessary! [[File:Toadlol.gif|30px]][[User:Ilove marioandtoad|Mario and Toad's Fan]][[File:Mario-1.gif|30px]] 21:58, 25 March 2011 (EDT)
Why are you erasing my enemy log? I barely get to contribut, since everything I know gets deleted, or considered not necessary! [[File:ToadwalkSMB2.gif|30px]][[User:Ilove marioandtoad|Mario and Toad's Fan]][[File:Mario-1.gif|30px]] 21:58, 25 March 2011 (EDT)


Then what kind of page can I create, without it getting erased? [[File:Toadlol.gif|30px]][[User:Ilove marioandtoad|Mario and Toad's Fan]][[File:Mario-1.gif|30px]] 22:08, 25 March 2011 (EDT)  
Then what kind of page can I create, without it getting erased? [[File:ToadwalkSMB2.gif|30px]][[User:Ilove marioandtoad|Mario and Toad's Fan]][[File:Mario-1.gif|30px]] 22:08, 25 March 2011 (EDT)  
PS Im new here, about a month here.
PS Im new here, about a month here.


Line 315: Line 315:
An article doesn't need to directly link to the redirect. -Mariomaster228
An article doesn't need to directly link to the redirect. -Mariomaster228
==Re:Maps==
==Re:Maps==
The [[Template:PMTTYDmap|PMTTYD map]] is ready. I'm not sure about the SMRPG one, because I don't really know the locations. {{User:SWFlash/Sig}}
The [[Template:PMTTYD map|PMTTYD map]] is ready. I'm not sure about the SMRPG one, because I don't really know the locations. {{User:SWFlash/Sig}}


== Friend request ==
== Friend request ==
Line 432: Line 432:
== Updating links in comments ==
== Updating links in comments ==


I'm really sorry about this, but I have to ask you to stop updating links in talk page comments. As long as the redirect isn't being deleted, there is no harm in talk page comments keeping the outdated links. In fact, it's the opposite: leaving the comments intact is actually better than tampering with them. Changing the links skews the history of the wiki - those pages ''were'' called those names for a while, and it would be perplexing to look back at comments made at that time and find them leading to a page that should have been a redirect (especially in conversations that are specifically about how one was a redirect while the other was the article). It's also ''technically'' a violation of the Courtesy Policy, which states that only broken coding and signatures can be changed; one could argue that red links would fall under the "broken coding" umbrella and should be replaced by {{tem|fakelink}} (I don't), but functioning redirects certainly don't fit the bill. Furthermore, having to update links is already a big, tedious hassle ''without'' having to worry about talk pages and archives (proposals, 'Shroom articles, etc.): as long as the mainspace (including galleries, templates, categories and files), policy and Help pages are up-to-date, our work is done.
I'm really sorry about this, but I have to ask you to stop updating links in talk page comments. As long as the redirect isn't being deleted, there is no harm in talk page comments keeping the outdated links. In fact, it's the opposite: leaving the comments intact is actually better than tampering with them. Changing the links skews the history of the wiki - those pages ''were'' called those names for a while, and it would be perplexing to look back at comments made at that time and find them leading to a page that should have been a redirect (especially in conversations that are specifically about how one was a redirect while the other was the article). It's also ''technically'' a violation of the Courtesy Policy, which states that only broken coding and signatures can be changed; one could argue that red links would fall under the "broken coding" umbrella and should be replaced by {{tem|fake link}} (I don't), but functioning redirects certainly don't fit the bill. Furthermore, having to update links is already a big, tedious hassle ''without'' having to worry about talk pages and archives (proposals, 'Shroom articles, etc.): as long as the mainspace (including galleries, templates, categories and files), policy and Help pages are up-to-date, our work is done.


Again, sorry about this - your help with updating all those articles is appreciated, and don't worry about having to go back and revert the talk pages you already updated: I got it covered. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 13:55, 11 June 2012 (EDT)
Again, sorry about this - your help with updating all those articles is appreciated, and don't worry about having to go back and revert the talk pages you already updated: I got it covered. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 13:55, 11 June 2012 (EDT)
Line 442: Line 442:
  Do you think that that page should stay as a redirect to the MP8 minigame or be turned into a disambig page? {{User:Humbug/sig}}
  Do you think that that page should stay as a redirect to the MP8 minigame or be turned into a disambig page? {{User:Humbug/sig}}


I did not know of that existing disambiguation page. [[File:Mandibug.png|35px|link=Special:Editcount/Humbug]] [[Special:Contributions/Humbug|Bah,]] [[User:Humbug|Humbug!]] [[File:FI Shine.png|35px|link=User talk:Humbug]] 11:45, 14 June 2012 (EDT)
I did not know of that existing disambiguation page. [[File:Mandibug.png|35px|link=Special:Editcount/Humbug]] [[Special:Contributions/Humbug|Bah,]] [[User:Humbug|Humbug!]] [[File:SMS Shine Sprite Artwork.png|35px|link=User talk:Humbug]] 11:45, 14 June 2012 (EDT)


== RE:Template Deleting ==
== RE:Template Deleting ==