Talk:Blooper Baby: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→5: new section) |
LinkTheLefty (talk | contribs) (→Blooper Babies: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Someone needs to learn how to count, because that 2D artwork has 4 Baby Bloopers. | Someone needs to learn how to count, because that 2D artwork has 4 Baby Bloopers. | ||
== Blooper Babies == | |||
As was mentioned a while back, this article should really be Blooper Baby, given its Tattle in ''Paper Mario'' and its earlier name in ''Leaping Lizards''...unless there was a basis for this in one of the player's guides, but even then I think those are usually overlooked if it's already mentioned in-game. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 16:59, 1 October 2014 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:59, October 1, 2014
Are these enemies called Baby Bloopers or Blooper Babies? The Paper Mario tattle seems to support the later. -- Son of Suns
Species
Shouldn't the species be blooper not baby? - Myles 23:20, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Baby Template
Should this go on the Baby Template? Mario freak (talk)
- No, the Baby template is for individual Baby charatcers, not a "species" of babies. - Walkazo 20:39, 30 June 2009 (EDT)
5
Someone needs to learn how to count, because that 2D artwork has 4 Baby Bloopers.
Blooper Babies
As was mentioned a while back, this article should really be Blooper Baby, given its Tattle in Paper Mario and its earlier name in Leaping Lizards...unless there was a basis for this in one of the player's guides, but even then I think those are usually overlooked if it's already mentioned in-game. LinkTheLefty (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2014 (EDT)
