Talk:Mecha Cheep: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Exactly.--[[User:Revenge of kurbio|<span style="color:blue">Revenge Of Kurbio</span>]] 08:35, 22 December 2012 (EST) | Exactly.--[[User:Revenge of kurbio|<span style="color:blue">Revenge Of Kurbio</span>]] 08:35, 22 December 2012 (EST) | ||
But it has NOTHING to do with PROPELLORS! it is mechanical and has a thing that wides up Mecha-Koopas. That's not a propellor. A mecha-cheep is far more brief than Propellor Cheep-Cheep. and i have a good reason. so it should really Be mecha-Cheep for the time-and-being! [[Special:Contributions/86.148.118.231|86.148.118.231]] 10:26, 22 December 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 11:26, December 22, 2012
Clockwork, not a propeller
Look closely and you'll see that. BooDestroyer (talk) 21:28, 11 December 2012 (EST)
you're right. Marioyoshi (talk)
Name
Is it official that it is called the propeller Cheep-Cheep. If anything (if it is not official) i'd call it a Mecha-Cheep (they resemble Mecha-Koopas) until we know the official name. 86.148.118.231 06:59, 22 December 2012 (EST)
It is not Official, but the real name is not known. Don't move it unless it's official. Mecha-Cheep is not official.--Revenge Of Kurbio 08:22, 22 December 2012 (EST)
- When choosing a conjectural name, it should be as brief and as accurate as possible. Personally, Propeller Cheep-Cheep seems distinguishing enough for a conjectural name. There is very little point in moving a conjectural title to another conjectural title, unless there widespread community support that the new conjectural name is more suitable.
Exactly.--Revenge Of Kurbio 08:35, 22 December 2012 (EST)
But it has NOTHING to do with PROPELLORS! it is mechanical and has a thing that wides up Mecha-Koopas. That's not a propellor. A mecha-cheep is far more brief than Propellor Cheep-Cheep. and i have a good reason. so it should really Be mecha-Cheep for the time-and-being! 86.148.118.231 10:26, 22 December 2012 (EST)
