View source for User talk:Camwoodstock/Archive 1

{{talk archive|User talk:Camwoodstock}}

==(first topic)==
Ha ha! I chose 777 because is is both the number of God and considered 'lucky'. Hey, if you need simple help, I may be able to help you. But you may be better off contacting an [[MarioWiki:administrator|administrator]] or [[MarioWiki:bureaucrat|bureaucrat]]. [[File:DarkBowserBIS.png|35px]][[User:DarkBowser777|<span style="font-family:serif;color:darkblue">DarkBowser777</span>]]([[User talk:DarkBowser777|talk]])[[File:Dreamy Bowser idle.png|35px]] 20:25, 13 August 2017 (EDT)

== RE: Trivia ==

It's not that trivia is outlawed on the wiki, it's just where possible we do try to [[MarioWiki:Notes|incorporate trivia]] into the main body of the article. I do apologise if my summary came off bad or rude towards you. Personally, I felt the ''Super Mario RPG'' part fitted well in the intro, hence why I thought it should stay there. But in all honesty, the second point probably is better of as a trivia point. {{User|Yoshi876}}

== RE: Spotlight ==

Will certainly take a look at including Skillit in a future edition, thanks for the suggestion. As for the Oxford comma, do you have a forum account? If you do, then I'd suggest starting a discussion [https://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=29237.0 here]. If not, just let me know, and I'll start it for you. {{User|Yoshi876}}
:No worries, I'll start a discussion soon for you. {{User|Yoshi876}}

== Shiny enemies ==

In regards to [[MarioWiki:Proposals#What_to_do_about_Paper_Jam_Shiny_articles|this proposal]], may I ask why you support giving the paper enemies separate articles but not the shiny enemies? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 17:58, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
:May I ask why splitting the shiny variants would be too much? Keep in mind we have already split pages like [[Gritty Goomba (Gwarhar Lagoon)|Gritty Goomba]] and [[Gritty Goomba (Teehee Valley)|Gritty Goomba]], among others, due to the two species having different appearances and different stats. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 19:03, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
::We don't necessarily need a monolithic, set-in-stone policy page to decide how things work; a policy page won't be able to cover every single nuance in the games, especially as the franchise comes up with new ideas and throws new gimmicks at us. At the same time, through proposals like these, we can create a precedent that can then be followed for future articles. Proposals give us freedom that a policy page may not give us. With that in mind, we've already had proposals that decided to [[Talk:Gritty_Goomba_(Gwarhar_Lagoon)#Merge_Gritty_Goomba_.28Gwarhar_Lagoon.29_with_Gritty_Goomba_.28Teehee_Valley.29|'''not''' merge the Gritty Goombas]] and [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/37#Merge_Dream_Team_enemies.27_articles_with_their_.22R.22_version|'''not''' merge the "R" version of enemies]], so I don't see why this should be any different. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 19:13, 15 September 2017 (EDT)

== Tips for Proposal ==

Hello. When making a talk page proposal, please remember to add the {{tem|TPP}} template to the top of the section. Also, TPP's end '''two weeks''' after the proposal's start. Regular proposals on the main page end after one week. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 14:04, 16 September 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Nerd rage ==

It's a simple mistake on my bit, I'm not too familiar with the subject but the important part is that we will be theming Issue 128 on 2D Mario games. [[User:Meta Knight|Meta Knight]] ([[User talk:Meta Knight|talk]]) 01:16, 17 September 2017 (EDT)

== RE: Yes, it's Cam again (shroom spotlight?) ==

Don't worry it's not annoying in the slightest :) Sadly, it was too late to include in this edition of Spotlight, all of our focuses were already decided upon, but we will take a lot at it for our November issue, October is usually a themed one. {{User|Yoshi876}}

== Skillit ==

Hello! What information is needed for the [[Skillit]] article? I have easy access to the game, so I could probably find more information on him if I know what is needed. --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 20:01, 19 September 2017 (EDT)
:Ok, I will try to find some more information (though it may be a few days, as I'm busy at the moment). I don't really think it needs more information about his personality; from what I remember about him, I feel that part is complete.--{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 11:16, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Question ==

Hello!

I used [http://ichrisi.bizhat.com/custom_js/picross_maker.html this website] to create the picrosses. Once they're generated, I used Snipping Tool to get a picture of them, and then I cropped and recoloured them in paint.NET. Sometimes the website makes mistakes when generating the puzzle, so I had to check over them to make sure the answer and the puzzle match up. If not, I just edit the numbers to make it match. Feel free to ask about anything else! {{User:Pyro Guy/sig}} 17:19, 21 September 2017 (EDT)

:The website doesn't generate a solution for you; instead, you'll have to Snipping Tool the original puzzle you drew, then paste that on top of the puzzle to get a cohesive solution. Have fun. {{User:Pyro Guy/sig}} 10:49, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

== Re: Question ==

Hello!

Your entire application is sent through a forum PM, as well as future submissions, so you can just submit your images in the same PM making a note of which image is which and things like that. For example, when I first applied I had my image I wanted in standard coding, and provided image links and/or the image itself outside the demo portion of the application but within the same PM. If you need anything else let me know, and I'm glad to see you're interested in writing! [[User:Meta Knight|Meta Knight]] ([[User talk:Meta Knight|talk]]) 18:24, 22 September 2017 (EDT)

== Proposals ==

Pardon me for bothering, but I've responded to several of the concerns that you raised on a couple of proposals: [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Remove_rule_4_of_the_talk_page_proposals|removing rule 4]] and [[Category_talk:Minor_NPCs#Delete_this_category|deleting the Minor NPCs category]]. I'd appreciate it if you could respond to them whenever you're able to. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 12:11, 10 October 2017 (EDT)

== This ain't clutter; it's Fun Stuff! ==

{{Funwarning|November 14th}}

Sorry for the lateness, I'll be more lenient on deadlines this time around cause of it. Thanks! {{User:Lord Bowser/sig}} 00:39, 10 November 2017 (EST)

== Rocky Wrench ==

Currently, Rocky Wrench is said to be a derivative of Monty Mole. Since we don't separate "versions" of these, this is saying that the mole and turtle are related. However, it is also saying that Rocky Wrench is based off of an enemy that wouldn't appear for four years, which makes no sense. I'm trying to rectify that. Also, a [[Bakky|bat]] is related to a [[Sea Bakky|sea slug]], which is even further apart from this, and I see no complaining about that from anyone. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:38, 9 May 2018 (EDT)

== Wario Ware characters ==
Seeing as you have improved most of the characters stories in the [[WWIMM]] article (Good job), I probably might suggest you to improve some of the wario ware characters article paragraphs; I recall you having a replay of the WWIMM game. {{User:PnnyCrygr/sig}} 06:11, May 8, 2023 (EDT)
:Thank you very much! We might take a stab at it at some point, but for now, though, we've already got enough on our plate with the MMG article itself, alongside a few other things (mostly proposal related), so that'd probably be something we go after later. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 10:26, May 8, 2023 (EDT)

== [[Talk:Wario's Warehouse#Delete page and anything related to it from the wiki]] ==

Just letting you know I've updated the proposal with a new option: "Move page to the BJAODN archive and remove anything else related to it from the wiki". {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 16:15, May 27, 2023 (EDT)

== Recurring themes proposal changes ==

Hey, just a heads up that I amended my proposal about recurring themes that you voted for, so I would recommend you go take a look at it and make sure you still agree with it. I changed the proposal to clarify/reword some points, include a list of definitions of terms, and adjusted the standard regarding remakes to be more consistent in response to people’s comments. If you have any questions, feel free to ask! [[User:ToxicOJ|ToxicOJ]] ([[User talk:ToxicOJ|talk]]) 03:07, November 4, 2023 (EDT)

== Re: Oops! Proposal stuff ==

I'm kinda confused on what the question is. I voted in the proposal because I feel the page is unneeded because Hip Koopa is a recurring character and the shows he was in didn't last very long. [[User:TheUndescribableGhost|TheUndescribableGhost]] ([[User talk:TheUndescribableGhost|talk]]) 11:02, November 12, 2023 (EST)
: Okay, I am on board for it affecting other articles as well. [[User:TheUndescribableGhost|TheUndescribableGhost]] ([[User talk:TheUndescribableGhost|talk]]) 13:16, November 12, 2023 (EST)

== Feedback for cleaning up Category:Thieves ==

Hello! [[User talk:Swallow#Category:Thieves cleanup|Swallow and I are discussing a cleanup]] of [[:Category:Thieves]]. Mind sharing your feedback? You were a great help in cleaning up the lookalike categories! [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 17:10, January 8, 2024 (EST)
:'''[[Category talk:Thieves#A dissection of the state of the category|Here ya go]]'''! 12k characters of category-analysis goodness. Hopefully we can move talk of what to do for the category over there now, since we've got the list there and all. ;P {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 20:32, January 8, 2024 (EST)
::Thanks for your hard work again! [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 20:52, January 8, 2024 (EST)
:::Just so you don't miss it, I updated my final comment in the talk page to further clarify my definition of "career thieves". [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 01:14, January 15, 2024 (EST)

== Wario's mother section on List of implied characters ==

Question does this piece of info that appears on the [[List of implied characters#Wario's mother|Wario's mother section of the List of implied characters article]] actually appear within [[Wario's Warehouse]] "Wario's Warehouse also states that Wario's mother perceives her son as so goofy that she never threw him a birthday party. Consequently, Wario does not know his age."<br><small>(unsigned by {{User|Jkgkffdfb}})</small>
: A very cursory search yields no results for "party" or "birthday", and "age" doesn't result in anything useful. This might be a fib, though admittedly, we're not the ones to ask on this, however--we're not exactly a massive authority on the Deep Wario's Warehouse Lore, and there's a very real chance we missed something in our cursory searches. We could confirm that the "he stole from his mom" line is 100% true however; just the first sentence of the ''Sonic Adventure 2: Battle'' section. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 11:57, January 28, 2024 (EST)

== In regards to the Smash category proposal ==
For clarification, was that solely for the series categories, or are the ''Smash'' redirects supposed to be de-categorized, period? (Like say, Charizard with category:Dragons and category:Fire creatures). [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 01:10, March 1, 2024 (EST)
: While we'd ''like'' to do the latter at some point (albeit on a more broad scope than just the redirects that happened to be in the "series" subcategories), we made the proposals with the former in mind. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 21:38, March 1, 2024 (EST)

== Proposal cleaned up ==

I cleaned up [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Broaden the scope of the &lcub;&lcub;unreferenced&rcub;&rcub; template|my proposal]] by adding the <code><nowiki><pre></nowiki></code> tags. You should take a look at what the template will look like from above. What do you think how my proposal looks? {{User:GuntherBB/sig}} 21:02, March 30, 2024 (EDT)

== BJAODN page for the aliens ==

<s>Phew, finally free from that pink ape... Thanks for saving me!</s> I saw your [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki%3ABJAODN%2FCharacters&diff=prev&oldid=4165931 suggestion] on splitting the [[Alien (Club Nintendo)|Alien (''Club Nintendo'')]] entry on [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Characters]] into its own article as a cautionary tale, and I wholeheartedly agree with doing that!

I've copied the entry in question to [[User:SolemnStormcloud/Sandbox#MarioWiki:BJAODN/Alien (Club Nintendo)|my sandbox]], but I'd like to expand on this idea of yours before I think about launching this page. Regardless of infamy, I personally consider [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/In the Clouds]] too short to have its own page and ''may'' (don't count on it) start a proposal to merge it to the [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Locations|Locations]] subpage. I allow anyone to edit my sandbox, so be my guest(s). [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 14:57, April 3, 2024 (EDT)
:Ah, we mentioned splitting it mostly so we could feature a before-and-after with it, rather than ''just'' its old incarnation; both as a cautionary tale, but also as a showcase of how even the most dubious of articles can be made into something more worthwhile and quality. We'd feel a little weird about writing that framing ourselves, though, as the people who fixed the article; so uh, if you want to take a shot at it yourself, be our guest! ;P {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:53, April 3, 2024 (EDT)
::I can't really think of how to write this framing, so I guess I'll just leave it as-is in the [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Characters|Characters]] subpage. Thanks for the feedback, though! [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 19:30, April 3, 2024 (EDT)

== Enacting proposal ==

I've been helping to enact your proposal for you. Many things are tagged for deletion, but hopefully this will help clear up to everyone what will be "pruned" from the wiki and what won't. Assist Trophy and Final Smash pages now have only ''Super Mario'' content, and the list pages have all of the ''Smash Bros.'' content (plus, I updated all of the redirects to the list pages accordingly). [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 17:59, April 12, 2024 (EDT)
: Wait, this is in regards to the [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/65#Trim or remove various Smash franchise-specific subcategories|proposal about categories, correct]]? (''To be fair''--we meant to run proposals on slimming down the Final Smash page in particular, and we might do it for Assist Trophies as well. But the first proposal was specifically about the various "&lt;x&gt; series" categories being inundated with redirects to the exact same few List pages.) {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 19:45, April 12, 2024 (EDT)
:: Yes, it was that proposal of yours. I slimmed down the [[Assist Trophy]] and [[Final Smash]] articles to cover only ''Super Mario'' content, while [[List of Assist Trophy characters]] and [[List of Final Smashes]] has all of the content on it. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 19:53, April 12, 2024 (EDT)
::: Listen, we're tired, so maybe we're just misunderstanding, but if we have things right, uh, we might have a problem. The proposal was specifically about the categories listed in the proposal, and specifically, removing the various redirect articles from those categories (e.g. removing the [[Bonus Fruit]] redirect link from the [[:Category:Pac-Man series]] category) or, in the case of some categories that were either majority or all redirects, wiping the category clean (e.g. removing all of the instances of the [[:Category:Fatal Fury series]] category and, by proxy, wiping its description as it no longer has a use). In essence, the proposal was to clean up ''categories'', not the articles themselves--that was something we planned to hold a vote on later. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 20:03, April 12, 2024 (EDT)
:::: I didn't tag any articles for deletion, only the redirects and a few disambiguation pages not concerning the ''Super Mario'' franchise at all (e.g. Thunder Jolt). [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 20:10, April 12, 2024 (EDT)
::::: To state this in clearer terms--no ''articles'' should be deleted, so at least that's true. However, the categories mentioned as exceptions in that Proposal (Duck Hunt, Fire Emblem, Metroid, Kid Icarus, Pikmin, Punch-Out!!, Star Fox, Animal Crossing, Dragon Quest, Game & Watch, Final Fantasy, Ice Climber, The Legend of Zelda, Pac-Man, Rhythm Heaven, Sonic the Hedgehog, Splatoon, and Street Fighter) should've had all the redirects/disambiguations in them lose the Series categories, while all the redirects within the categories that were ''not'' exceptions (so, every other Category mentioned in the proposal's opening that wasn't a part of that list) should've had ''all'' articles that mention its category lose the category, and wipe the now-orphaned category description. The [[Final Smash]] and [[Assist Trophy]] articles were not mentioned in the proposal, thus, they shouldn't have been touched at all--not yet, anyways. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 20:18, April 12, 2024 (EDT)

== What was the main page design idea that you had? ==
I think you said you wanted to show in Paint.NET how you envisioned the explore/navigate cells looking in the proposed main page design. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 23:57, May 20, 2024 (EDT)
:Ah, shoot, it slipped our mind entirely. The past few days, we've kinda been tied up in something. (For today, it's mostly been wrestling a nasty tooth cavity.) We'd like to hopefully get around to it before the proposal ends, but admittedly, it's a pretty low priority for us...  {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 01:05, May 21, 2024 (EDT)

== Smash Bros. proposals ==

I think I'm going to stop doing ''Smash Bros.'' proposals, since you and the community here seem to have a better idea on how to handle ''Smash'' coverage.

Was going to say (and this is not at all directed at you) that the argument of "I don't like this wiki" (which I've seen someone say about SmashWiki in a proposal) should NEVER be an excuse to keep loosely or entirely unrelated content. It's also selfish when considering that are more dedicated wikis that could really use the help with such content, especially NintendoWiki, and the right course of action was moving the Memory Card page over to there. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 14:32, June 5, 2024 (EDT)

==Vandal interactions==
Hey, thanks for reverting the vandal, but please don't talk to them in the summaries with insults. This is from someone on last warn for making this mistake; just leave the edit summary blank. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 17:07, June 7, 2024 (EDT)
:Aye, fair enough. <s>though also, admittedly, we doubt many people are going to swing to bat at a vandal that made exactly 4 edits,</s> {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 17:08, June 7, 2024 (EDT)
::Yah, just affirming what Somethingone said. But no worries, either of you. {{User:Mario/sig}} 17:29, June 7, 2024 (EDT)

== ''Superstar Saga'' gear ==
Nintendo101 showed me that the PRIMA guide tells where everything is found [https://archive.org/details/marioluigisuperstarsagaofficialplayersguide_201912/page/n125/mode/2up on these pages]. Granted, they might incorrectly say some unused things are unobtainable, but I see no reason not to assume the "found at the store at this specific point" ones are accurate. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:34, January 25, 2025 (EST)
:Thanks for the pointer, much appreciated! If you have a similar guide for the remake, that would also be nice; the remake is surprisingly under-documented, it turns out, which is what spurred this whole thing for us. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 15:38, January 25, 2025 (EST)
::The gear page for the remake is actually pretty well-described on that front, last I checked. I don't believe an official guide was made for it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:52, January 25, 2025 (EST)

== Hi! ==

Is the Claire in this group my best friend? -Rowan ([[User:XXMeta KnightmareXX|XXMeta KnightmareXX]] ([[User talk:XXMeta KnightmareXX|talk]]) 14:34, February 17, 2025 (EST))

== WarioWare Gold Studio Sessions ==

Hey. So, I noticed you said you wanted ''WarioWare Gold'' souvenir groups to have articles. I could create a Studio Sessions article, but I don't want to step on your work if you're doing it. Should I go ahead and start planning such an article? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 16:12, March 1, 2025 (EST)
:Go right on ahead! We've mostly been focusing off-and-on on the Game & Wario prizes ourselves, and our hope is to one day have proper parity for all the souvenir-likes; this would be a step in the right direction for that! {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:41, March 1, 2025 (EST)

== Your recent edit to your comment on my proposal ==

I think y'all had it right the first time — in its current state, it's pitching four colors, two of which are for poll proposals that have concluded. I think "partially concluded, partially ongoing" was one phrase in the first version of that comment, but the use of a comma made it a little confusing. [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 15:36, March 5, 2025 (EST)
:Ah. Admittedly, it was a little unclear to us on re-read, so we felt it was important to try to clarify, but evidently that didn't quite work out. Apologies. ^^; {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 17:08, March 5, 2025 (EST)

== Unimplemented proposals ==

Hi, Camwoodstock, Tori, Cecil and Claire. I wanted to reach out to you guys here to touch base on the fact that there five of your passed proposals are [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Unimplemented proposals|unimplemented]], and while one of them seems to be a larger project, the other four seem smaller and straight-forward. Do you think you can get to these soon? Would you like any help? - [[User:Nintendo101|Nintendo101]] ([[User talk:Nintendo101|talk]]) 12:51, March 8, 2025 (EST)
:We'd appreciate the help, yes; usually, when we make a proposal like the Ink Bomb split or the Wiggler Farm merge, it's because there's a potential large change we've noticed (usually due to a maintenance template that's been sitting there for ''months'') for a game that we aren't quite as knowledgeable on, but there's a glaringly obvious fix waiting for someone more capable to help implement. Even though we're admittedly no experts on Bowser's Fury would gladly assist in any way we can, though. The ''G&W'' Cluck-A-Pop prizes and ''M&L'' Accessories are the big targets for us at the moment, though again, if you have anything to add to them, please do so. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 13:01, March 8, 2025 (EST)

== Confirmation ==
Hi! I just wanted to confirm that my recent proposal to move about 11,000 bytes of the lists of references in first and third party games over to a list of references in pre-release and unused content will not interfere with any potential future splits. To use an A-M/N-Z split as an example, such a split would still be possible post-move, just minus the 11,000 bytes. [[User:Nelsonic|Nelsonic]] ([[User talk:Nelsonic|talk]]) 22:28, April 2, 2025 (EDT)
:That's what we assumed, given what was already said during the proposal, but good to know! {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 22:32, April 2, 2025 (EDT)

== Mario Factory ==

Can I try adding more information to [[User:Camwoodstock/Mario Factory]]? [[User:Fox de Quintal|Fox de Quintal]] ([[User talk:Fox de Quintal|talk]]) 00:53, April 18, 2025 (EDT)
:Depends on what that information is, and more importantly, where it's sourced from. (To be honest, if your additions are coming from an AI, we would say no; we are ''extremely'' skeptical of basically anything an AI says on principle, given its penchant to hallucinate information from sources that don't actually exist anywhere. With a subject as obscure and undocumented as the Game Processor, where most of its information that's actually accessible to the public coming from old expired patents, it is exceptionally vulnerable to something like an AI gumming things up and causing misinformation to run rampant.) {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 01:13, April 18, 2025 (EDT)

==''[[Mario Teaches Typing]]'' CD-ROM port==
Hi! I just wanted to ask if (since the proposal to split the CD-ROM version you had mentioned passed) there was an official name for this CD-ROM variant that you were aware of? I tried searching for it, but I found what simply appears to be ''Mario Teaches Typing'' in CD-ROM form ([https://www.reddit.com/r/gamecollecting/comments/is8gc5/scored_this_copy_of_mario_teaches_typing_for_1/ shown here] [https://static.mercdn.net/item/detail/orig/photos/m17610593617_1.jpg?1713170263 and here]), in addition to results showing something by the name of ''{{fake link|Mario Teaches Typing Enhanced CD-ROM}}'' ([https://www.discogs.com/release/23089520-Legacy-X-Mario-Teaches-Typing shown here] [https://cdromfossil.com/2019/02/18/marios-short-time-on-pc-and-as-a-teacher/ and here]). I... can't tell which is which, if one of these is fictional, or if ''Mario Teaches Typing'' had an additional CD-ROM release I wasn't aware of. Can you help me out, please? {{User:Nelsonic/sig}} 18:19, June 8, 2025 (EDT)
:Sorry for the delay, the Internet Archive was down. Sifting through other copies, and from what we could tell after poring through the Discogs link, it seems like the jewel case/other packaging would specify it as the "Enhanced CD-ROM" version, but the actual CD itself would just say ''Mario Teaches Typing'' on it. So the release specifically is probably called "''Mario Teaches Typing Enhanced CD-ROM''", but the game itself is still just ''Mario Teaches Typing'', but, y'know, on CD. If that makes sense? {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:15, June 9, 2025 (EDT)
::Thanks for the information! Yes, that makes perfect sense. {{User:Nelsonic/sig}} 16:23, June 9, 2025 (EDT)

== Genuine question ==
Do you leave a trail of blue coins now? [[File:Blue Coin SM64.gif]][[File:Blue Coin SM64.gif]][[File:Blue Coin SM64.gif]][[File:Blue Coin SM64.gif]]{{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 16:03, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
:We... Don't think we understand the bit ^^; {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:04, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
::Just friendly acknowledgement of your username being blue now, as in, you becoming a patroller. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 17:27, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
:::Ohhh! We assumed there was some weird interaction with Blue Coins we somehow missed in Mario 64. Pardon our overthinking. ;P {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 17:42, June 30, 2025 (EDT)

==''Game Boy Aging Cartridge''==
Hi! I just wanted to check whether or not we'd decided that the ''Game Boy Aging Cartridge'' was still set to get its own page? I wasn't sure, since the proposal is currently marked as green in the proposal archive. {{User:Nelsonic/sig}} 16:06, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
:We didn't envision any of the diagnostic software getting its own page to start out--for the proposal itself, we anticipated giving them just sections on the [[Internal test]] page--but in the future, we could see at least a few splits happening. (Most likely NTF 2.5 Test Cartridge.) The main thing that needed a page, [[Game Boy Color Promotional Demo]], has had its page deployed. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:09, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
::{{@|Camwoodstock}} Understood. My confusion stemmed from the comments section on the draft page, I believe. <small>Also, apologies, I vanished directly off the face of the Earth right when work needed to be done.</small> {{User:Nelsonic/sig}} 16:19, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
:::{{@|Nelsonic}} No problem! Also, if you want any help with the ''snd_test'' page itself, just let us know. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:24, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
::::{{@|Camwoodstock}} Thanks for the offer! I actually do have a question. You uploaded an image of the level completion screen under the file name {{file link|Sndtest Victory.png}}. What must be done in-game to cause this screen to appear? I've played the test myself, and I ended up kind of wandering around... <small>Aimlessly...</small> {{User:Nelsonic/sig}} 16:40, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
:::::{{@|Nelsonic}} It's pretty simple; you clear a level by grabbing all those gray collectible things. ;P {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:54, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
::::::{{@|Camwoodstock}} Ah, understood. Thanks! {{User:Nelsonic/sig}} 16:55, June 30, 2025 (EDT)

== Have fun with the broom! ==
I know y'all will like the new tools you have. You earned it! [[File:WC98 Mario V-sign.png]]  {{User:Mario/sig}} 20:01, June 30, 2025 (EDT)
:Thanks!! {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 20:08, June 30, 2025 (EDT)

== Proposal ==

:Excuse me, but can you please vote for the [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Permit creation of categories based on "microgame" themes|"Permit creation of categories based on "microgame" themes"]] at [[MarioWiki:Proposals]]?--[[User:Tails101|Tails101]] ([[User talk:Tails101|talk]]) 20:47, July 24, 2025 (EDT)
::Do not solicit for votes in proposals. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:37, July 24, 2025 (EDT)

== Rework ''Super Mario Galaxy'' and ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' appearance tables ==
I'm not an expert on proposals, so correct me if I'm wrong, but did you forget to withdraw your vote for option A in favor of Option C on the "Rework ''Super Mario Galaxy'' and ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' appearance tables" proposal? {{User:Sargent Deez/sig}} 19:40, September 6, 2025 (EDT)
:You can vote for multiple options--it's voting for ''every'' option that isn't permitted, as it'd be functionally identical to not voting at all. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 19:58, September 6, 2025 (EDT)

== "don't try to fight us" ????????? ==

neither I nor the paragraph says "since the arcade game". It says since his establishment as a hero (or, more accurately, "Despite his prominence as a hero,") -- i.e., the Donkey Kong Country franchise. Every game you listed is pre-Donkey Kong Country, and every game post-Donkey Kong Country where he appears as a boss or antagonist is either a Mario vs. Donkey Kong game, or a direct port of the original arcade games (NES Remix and its sequels and Nintendo World Championships: NES Edition). Scroll through his list of appearances. Stating that he has "[d]espite his prominence as a hero, he has reprised his role as the antagonist on multiple occasions, mainly in the Mario vs. Donkey Kong series" is objectively wrong. I'm open to rewording it to specifically mention NES Remix and Nintendo World Championships, but I think those are clearly different cases that don't really warrant a shoutout in the opening paragraph.

And what is this "don't try to fight us on this" bull??? For what reason am I not allowed to debate you on this? Because I'm not logged in? Because you're staff? That's so incredibly dismissive, unhelpful, and unwelcoming to any user who is trying to contribute, especially in a case like this where your argument doesn't even address what I'm talking about! Way out of line, my dude[s]. [[Special:Contributions/204.111.132.184|204.111.132.184]] 13:51, September 12, 2025 (EDT)
:Okay, that makes a smidgen more sense. In general, that sentence is kinda just worded poorly, we'll say--in its current form, it doesn't denote that Donkey Kong mostly became a protagonist after Country, and just kind of vaguely implies a shift happened, ''somewhere''.
:As for the "don't fight on it" thing... It's because edit warring is against the rules, and so it should've been clarified or asked about--like this--before an attempt to re-insert it. We thought that much was apparent. Probably should've worded that better, but, ah, well. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 13:56, September 12, 2025 (EDT)
::(Well there was ''Odyssey'', though that was a cameo...) [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:14, September 12, 2025 (EDT)

== New subject ==

{{tem|upcoming}} is used for the upcoming game itself only. {{tem|new subject}} should be used for things in upcoming games. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 21:00, September 13, 2025 (EDT)
:Ah, gotcha. Was unsure of how to handle that! {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 21:05, September 13, 2025 (EDT)

== Minor edits ==
Make sure to mark small edits, like adding a navbox to page, as [[Help:Editing#Minor edits|minor]]. This is so users can filter them out when the recent changes become too flooded. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 08:25, September 17, 2025 (EDT)
:Agh, knew we probably should've done something like that. Our bad. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 11:17, September 17, 2025 (EDT)

== Question ==
Hi! I reverted an edit on the [[Kong]] page because I felt there was info that felt extraneous, the user [[https://www.mariowiki.com/Special:Contributions/Wario876]] that added was recently been unblocked from edit warring and I suggested to make a discussion post on the matter instead of adding the info back after I removed it. They then sent me a message [[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Sdman213&diff=prev&oldid=5052073]] on my talk page that had a very rude tone, (i.e. using caps and periods telling me to leave them alone.) Recently they made a discussion post also using rude wording towards me here. [[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk%3AKong&type=revision&diff=5052964&oldid=4806253]]. It is never my intention to be rude or edit war with other users and just want to peacefully contribute to the Wiki like other users. Thanks for your time and have a nice day.
[[User:Sdman213|Sdman213]] ([[User talk:Sdman213|talk]]) 19:45, September 17, 2025 (EDT)
:The user in question has been warned for this. Thanks for bringing it to our attention! :O {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 18:19, September 18, 2025 (EDT)
::Thanks so much, I really appreciate it and the work all of you do for the Wiki!! [[User:Sdman213|Sdman213]] ([[User talk:Sdman213|talk]]) 18:35, September 18, 2025 (EDT)

Update: [[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Appeals&curid=117011&diff=5053166&oldid=4954505]] they made an appeal on the warning, and it feels like the wording is also putting me in a bad light, when again I feel I couldn't feel I could calmly respond to their initial mesgage because of how it was worded. [[User:Sdman213|Sdman213]] ([[User talk:Sdman213|talk]]) 19:37, September 18, 2025 (EDT)
:We're well aware, don't worry. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 19:39, September 18, 2025 (EDT)
::Ty so much, I appreciate it [[User:Sdman213|Sdman213]] ([[User talk:Sdman213|talk]]) 19:41, September 18, 2025 (EDT)

== appeal ==

{{Appeal notice}} {{User:Colin's world 3 YT/sig}} 08:25, September 26, 2025 (EDT)

== DK3DG ==

So, I've just noticed that you uploaded sprites from ''[[Donkey Kong 3: Dai Gyakushū]]'', so does that mean you own the game, or did you take the sprites from Spriter's Resource? If you do, can you provide screenshots? The wiki is short on this game's screenshots. {{User:Colin's world 3 YT/sig}} 09:10, September 27, 2025 (EDT)

== The Block of IP Address 107.116.98.65  ==

Hi, I just saw that you blocked IP address [[Special:Contributions/107.116.98.65|107.116.98.65]] for vandalism, but all they did was remove a couple of Featured Article notices, so I'm not too sure if that was vandalism or if their edits were block worthy. I didn't find their edits too detrimental to the articles. [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 11:11, September 29, 2025 (EDT)

:They also made two previous unconstructive edits under a different IP address in the [[Special:Contributions/107.116.98.0/24|same range]]. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 11:15, September 29, 2025 (EDT)
:The [[Template:FA|FA]] template is expressly used to denote that an article is featured, including giving the page the [[:Category:Featured articles|Featured articles]] category. Removing it senselessly when the page has not, in fact, been unfeatured, would be vandalism. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 13:04, September 29, 2025 (EDT)
::Thank you both for making me more aware. I guess I need to pay more attention to things, namely the fact that the IP address was evading a ban. [[User:Mari0fan100|Mari0fan100]] ([[User talk:Mari0fan100|talk]]) 16:41, September 29, 2025 (EDT)

== Appeal notice ==

{{appeal notice|Wariowarefan100|type=Last warning}}

== About you reverting my edits. ==
It makes absolutely no sense that pages like DKCR got to have the pages and when I did the same for Super Mario Party Jamboree nothing happened, and this does not make any sense at all. Also keep in mind all of those edits were for nothing. [[User:ILoveBFDI1215|ILoveBFDI1215]] ([[User talk:ILoveBFDI1215|talk]]) 23:36, October 16, 2025 (EDT)
:If you're talking about adding ''Jamboree'' to the minigame pages' infoboxes, those are generally more fair to repeat games on. Some subjects tend to recur between games (even as far back as ''[[Mario Party 2]]'', there were some holdover minigames from ''[[Mario Party]]'', and of course, ''Mario Kart'' courses recur all the time), and so, on a case-by-case basis, it ''is'' permitted to repeat these... However, the level infobox is not one of these cases. When in doubt, just ask when it's fine to list multiple games. (Also, admittedly, your message's a big vague, so if you mean that you went ahead and added ''[[Super Mario Party Jamboree – Nintendo Switch 2 Edition + Jamboree TV]]'' alongside the mention of ''[[Super Mario Party Jamboree]]'', which, we couldn't find any instances of that, but if you did that... ''That would be a problem,'' and those, also, should have been undone.)<br>And, for the record--we don't think of your edits as being "for nothing". Heck, '''once the remake releases, we would be fine with bringing back the mention of their presence in the Switch 2 edition in the article lead.''' That would be perfectly fine to do! It's their presence in the infobox, as well as the pre-emptive deployment before the Switch 2 version properly released, that we hold qualms with. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 23:45, October 16, 2025 (EDT)
::I understand. I'm really sorry for this. [[User:ILoveBFDI1215|ILoveBFDI1215]] ([[User talk:ILoveBFDI1215|talk]]) 23:49, October 16, 2025 (EDT)
:::Not a problem. When in doubt, just consult the Manual of Style, or even just ask around if you're really unsure. :O {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 23:54, October 16, 2025 (EDT)

== RE: Paper Mario items tables ==

Hi, as a not native speaker, sometimes I don't understand some parts of sentences. Can you elaborate on this: "As a reminder, try to avoid putting images in headers, however, as it may prove cumbersome in some circumstances." Specifically the headers part. And if something is wrong, can you take one of the pages and fix it there, so I could fix it in other pages? --[[User:Mid188|Mid188]] ([[User talk:Mid188|talk]]) 18:34, November 1, 2025 (EDT)

:Nevermind, I looked at you fixing it and now know what was wrong. Will not do it in future pages.--[[User:Mid188|Mid188]] ([[User talk:Mid188|talk]]) 18:39, November 1, 2025 (EDT)
::Shoot, sorry we were late to the punch. No problem, though, and once again, we appreciate the work on sorting those tables! :O {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 18:45, November 1, 2025 (EDT)

== Red links ==

thanks for letting me know on this i'll know for future reference not to remove redlinks -- User:Donald Trump