Editing Talk:Kuro Neko

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 13: Line 13:
#{{User|Bop1996}} Per Marshal Dan Troop's comment.
#{{User|Bop1996}} Per Marshal Dan Troop's comment.
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} While it is true that the princess and the cat are the same saying that is the reason they should be merged is a flawed argument because we have articles on many other things that are the same. And while you may argue that we have a precedent to merge them I will argue that what you want to do is selectively enforce it which is wrong. If Black Cat should be merged because it is the same thing as the Princess then the precedent must carry to all examples which means we must merge Dr. Mario, Baby Mario, Baby Luigi, Baby Peach, Baby Bowser, Baby DK, Baby Daisy, and Mr. L because they aren't different characters. Dr. Mario is simply Mario wearing a labcoat, the babies are literally the younger forms of the characters, and Mr. L is just a brainwashed version of Luigi which imo means that he has even less of a reason to has his own article then Cassanova Koopa because while Cassanova Koopa is in fact Luigi at least in that case he at least totally changed his appearance while Mr. L mealy changed his clothes and became more arrogant (because he was you know brainwashed). I feel that there is no actual reason to exempt these characters from being merged other then the belief that they are more important to the plot then other characters like nurse toadstool, black cat, and cassanova koopa. And I would argue that, that is A: irrelevant because the precedent was established based on importance it was established based on the fact that they are the same. And B: it is wrong because while they may not be important to the overall series they are important to specific events with Cassanova Koopa playing a large role in and episode of the cartoon and Black Cat playing a large role in Wario Land 4. Also if you wish to apply this precedent you must also apply it to enemies which means that Paragoomba needs to be merged with goomba (because they are just goombas with wings) and Paratroopa needs to be merged with Koopa Troopa because they are just Koopas with wings. In conclusion I oppose on the grounds that I find that the precedent which you base your argument off of is flawed, because I don't think Black Cat should be merged, and because I don't feel it's fair to only selectively apply a precedent.
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} While it is true that the princess and the cat are the same saying that is the reason they should be merged is a flawed argument because we have articles on many other things that are the same. And while you may argue that we have a precedent to merge them I will argue that what you want to do is selectively enforce it which is wrong. If Black Cat should be merged because it is the same thing as the Princess then the precedent must carry to all examples which means we must merge Dr. Mario, Baby Mario, Baby Luigi, Baby Peach, Baby Bowser, Baby DK, Baby Daisy, and Mr. L because they aren't different characters. Dr. Mario is simply Mario wearing a labcoat, the babies are literally the younger forms of the characters, and Mr. L is just a brainwashed version of Luigi which imo means that he has even less of a reason to has his own article then Cassanova Koopa because while Cassanova Koopa is in fact Luigi at least in that case he at least totally changed his appearance while Mr. L mealy changed his clothes and became more arrogant (because he was you know brainwashed). I feel that there is no actual reason to exempt these characters from being merged other then the belief that they are more important to the plot then other characters like nurse toadstool, black cat, and cassanova koopa. And I would argue that, that is A: irrelevant because the precedent was established based on importance it was established based on the fact that they are the same. And B: it is wrong because while they may not be important to the overall series they are important to specific events with Cassanova Koopa playing a large role in and episode of the cartoon and Black Cat playing a large role in Wario Land 4. Also if you wish to apply this precedent you must also apply it to enemies which means that Paragoomba needs to be merged with goomba (because they are just goombas with wings) and Paratroopa needs to be merged with Koopa Troopa because they are just Koopas with wings. In conclusion I oppose on the grounds that I find that the precedent which you base your argument off of is flawed, because I don't think Black Cat should be merged, and because I don't feel it's fair to only selectively apply a precedent.
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per Marshal's arguments. Additionally, being the writer of this article I don't want it to get merged anyway D:


====Comments====
====Comments====

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: