MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
m (→Comments) |
|||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
#[[User:Gofer|Gofer]] -- As everyone said, there's no efficient way of enforcing it, using the javascript code would more encourage spam than anything and using block would be ridiculous. As Cobold said, paying attention to false edit summaries would be a better thing to do. | #[[User:Gofer|Gofer]] -- As everyone said, there's no efficient way of enforcing it, using the javascript code would more encourage spam than anything and using block would be ridiculous. As Cobold said, paying attention to false edit summaries would be a better thing to do. | ||
#{{User:Great Gonzo/sig}} Ya whateveryone said :) | #{{User:Great Gonzo/sig}} Ya whateveryone said :) | ||
#{{User:3dejong/sig|rediculicorish!}} It's stupid to force a summary. Use the "diff to peniultimate" buttons to figure out what they did. It's easy. | #{{User:3dejong/sig|rediculicorish!}} It's stupid to force a summary. Use the "diff to peniultimate" buttons to figure out what they did. It's easy. | ||
#23:07, 17 June 2007 (EDT) 3D's option is what I do everytime, actually, and it works fine. Plus, I'd go easy on yourself. If you add this, it's just one more thing to look after. P.S. I'm sorry that Hk yelled at you :( | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== |
Revision as of 23:07, June 17, 2007
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~). How To
The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. New FeaturesForce Edit SummariesShort & simple: Edit summaries are nice little notices when looking at a revision of what to expect in a diff, or, what the contributor edited. When editing a section, the edit summary links to that section as a default, but very often contributors are leaving edit summaries blank. In 1.10, if an edit summary is left blank when creating a new page, the beginning of the page's content is shown by default, which can clog recent changes. I found a Javascript code released in the public domain on Wikipedia that will force the use of edit summaries if it is left blank by either displaying a message or flashing the edit summary input line when submitting. Should I implement this and thus force a better user habit? Proposer: Wa TC@Y Make it Mandatory
Keep it Optional
CommentsWelcoming CommitteeI propose a Welcoming Committee that will be run by yours truly. The welcoming comtiee will make sure Every User gets a welcome, welcoming will not be restricted to just Committee members everyone can help. The Committee will also help users with user stuff and mariowiki stuff, a Committee member will have had to be aroud for a while, be able to handle stress, and great knowledge of WikiSyntax. I see how this Committee will do no harm, besides all it will do is help. Support
OpposeCommentsBean, you need a better reason than that, and I already said we could help newbies without a committee, Hk.
So I can add comittee members, cause you don't want a new user showing up and asking someone for help but they don't know what to do. all I'm saying is I want people who know what their doing to be the comitttee. And the leader (Me) make sures that they know what their doing...You don't members who can barely help themselves on it. XzelionETC RemovalsNone active currently MiscellaneousNone active currently |