381,815
edits
User talk:Walkazo: Difference between revisions
m
Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[MarioWiki:Good Writing +[[MarioWiki:Good writing)
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[MarioWiki:Good Writing +[[MarioWiki:Good writing)) |
||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
:::Additionally, you're saying the personality section reads too much into a very basic character, but if the personality section could be written like that, isn't he not just a basic character? To reason that, he has new dialogue on a constant basis. The stuff that was written there takes from a character who does a ton of talking, and who as a constant, keeps being fleshed out with more character dialogue. I feel like it's important to point that out. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 23:48, 8 January 2016 (EST) | :::Additionally, you're saying the personality section reads too much into a very basic character, but if the personality section could be written like that, isn't he not just a basic character? To reason that, he has new dialogue on a constant basis. The stuff that was written there takes from a character who does a ton of talking, and who as a constant, keeps being fleshed out with more character dialogue. I feel like it's important to point that out. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 23:48, 8 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::::Yeah, I saw your response to her. And I'm sticking to my assessment: the Arcade Bunny may be funny, but that can still be concisely added to the intro without the need for a separate section. Needless details and overwritten descriptions are fluff. Just because a lot of writing ''can'' be plopped down onto a page doesn't mean that it ''should'', and how the article was before is ''not'' how these sections should be written: I suggest you look over [[MarioWiki:Good | ::::Yeah, I saw your response to her. And I'm sticking to my assessment: the Arcade Bunny may be funny, but that can still be concisely added to the intro without the need for a separate section. Needless details and overwritten descriptions are fluff. Just because a lot of writing ''can'' be plopped down onto a page doesn't mean that it ''should'', and how the article was before is ''not'' how these sections should be written: I suggest you look over [[MarioWiki:Good writing]] for more specifics on what to avoid. Similarly, just because a section ''can'' be made doesn't mean it ''should'' be made: introductions are perfectly acceptable locations for general information like personality and appearance when the amount of said info together only amounts to a paragraph or two even when combined with all the other basic info like first appearances and role in the game. Right now, the Arcade Bunny's intro, with personality and appearance, is one well-written paragraph, and it should be left that way. - [[User:Walkazo|Walkazo]] 00:00, 9 January 2016 (EST) | ||
==Seal & Clapper== | ==Seal & Clapper== | ||