User:Knife/Policy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Newsubject +new subject))
 
(16 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Warning templates have been around since the creation of the Super Mario Wiki and are used to keep track of a user's disciplinary history as well as provide justification for blocks/bans. Once a warning has been issued, it cannot be removed without going through an [[MarioWiki:Appeals|appeal]]. Removing a warning template without going through an appeal is reason for another warning.
The series is continually adding games to its portfolio and we should be aware of guidelines set in place to deal with the new content these games are bringing. This page emphasizes on unreleased video games but will also cover any other type of unreleased media, which will collectively be referred to as “projects”. In addition, the page covers how information can turn into beta elements and what to do in case of a cancelled project. This page does not detail how to start an article on a new project, but rather how to deal with information regarding new games and other media.


The following templates are considered warning templates:
==Released vs. unreleased projects==
If a project is slated for an international release, the project is considered released only when it is released in an English speaking country. This is because content may change in the translation process and Super Mario Wiki has a primarily English speaking audience. If the project clearly is not going to be released in an English speaking country and it has been released somewhere else, the project can be considered released. The official release date is what is used when determining when a project is released, regardless of when retailers start selling the product.


*{{tem|Userspace}}
==New articles pertaining to upcoming projects==
*{{tem|Reminder}}
Generally, new articles on subjects in upcoming projects are only allowed if the articles have sufficient information backed up by reliable references. Articles that only mention the future appearance of the subject or other minor details will be deleted immediately. If an article does have sufficient information, place {{Tem|new subject}} at the top of the page to point out that the article is subject to major changes. Once the information has been rewritten and more content has been added, the template may be removed.
*{{tem|Warning}}
*{{tem|Lastwarn}}


==Warnable Offenses==
==Previously existing articles in upcoming projects==
Here are some common reasons for warnings on the Super Mario Wiki:
Information about subjects in upcoming projects with pre-existing articles is allowed as long as the information is not speculation and is accompanied by solid references. Unlike new articles pertaining to upcoming projects, there is no minimum for length of content. Statements like “[subject] may make an appearance in [future project]” are not allowed. When adding information about an upcoming project to an article, make a separate section to distinguish it from existing information. Place {{Tem|new subject-section}} at the top of this section to signal to other editors and readers that the information is subject to change because the project hasn’t been released yet. Once information has been rewritten and more content has been added, the template may be removed.


*Vandalizing pages
==Beta elements, vaporware, and cancelled projects==
*Impersonating another user
It is almost inevitable that a project will have certain aspects of it cut or changed from the final product. The information before it is altered for the final product is referred to as beta elements. When editors discover discrepancies between information about an unreleased game and its final product, editors should move that information to the relevant beta elements page.
*Editing userspace too much
*Creating sockpuppets
*Making major changes without approval
*Not marking minor edits as "minor"
*Not marking a flood of edits as "minor"
*Using mainspace talk pages for unconstructive purposes
*Entering speculation or false information into articles
*Enforcing a proposal before it has been passed
*Participating in an edit war
*Making too many consecutive edits to one page
*Using the site to advertise a product
*Removing/altering other users' content (votes, comments, etc.)
*Undermining admin authority
*Falsely claiming to be an admin
*Removing a warning without an appeal
*Editing an archive without good reason
*Flaming and making disruptive comments
*Abusing warning privileges
*Repeating the same offense (usually escalates the warning to to a higher level)
*Failure to follow [[:Category:MarioWiki Policy|policy]]


Reasons other than the ones listed above may be used depending on the situation.
Although rare, it is possible for a project to be left in perpetual development or be completely cancelled. When the former occurs, the project is referred to as vaporware. When a project becomes vaporware or cancelled, a page should be created for the vaporware/cancelled project and all relevant information needs to be merged to that article.


==Procedure==
==References==
If you feel like another user has violated a rule, you may issue a warning. Before doing so, contemplate whether the user really deserves the warning. Since warnings are serious accusations, use them responsibly. Abuse of warning privileges is grounds for a warning of your own or block. Follow these steps:
{{Main|MarioWiki:References}}


#Identify the problem. If the problem is something that can be resolved through discussion, try that first.
Whenever adding information about upcoming projects, it is necessary to cite your sources. This is because the information comes from secondary sources rather than the project itself. When making a new article or adding information to an existing article about an upcoming project, you need to cite your sources. Edits that do not follow this standard will be reverted without notice. Once the project has been released and the information is clearly present in the released project, you may remove these references. Just remember that references should stay in cases where the information is only present from secondary sources.
#Determine the right template for the situation. If the offense is minor, consider giving a {{Tem|Reminder}} as opposed to a {{Tem|Warning}}
#Place the template on the user's talk page and clarify the reason for the warning. It is extremely important that you make it clear what the warning was for.


Alternatively, you may contact a [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|Sysop]] or [[Special:ListUsers/patroller|Patroller]] and ask them to deal with the problem.
==Revision==
The procedure for rewriting information about an upcoming project upon release will vary depending on the quality of the information prior to the rewrite. You may follow this checklist for some guidance:


==FAQ==
#Change all future tense words to present tense. For example, replace words like "will appear in" to "appears in".
'''Q. Does my warning ever expire?'''<br>
#Remove unnecessary references. Examples of this are information with references which can readily be found in the released project.
A. No, warnings are permanent records.
#Add more content if possible.
#Add or update images/templates as necessary.
#Remove the {{Tem|new subject}} or {{Tem|new subject-section}} templates.


'''Q. Can anyone give out warnings?'''<br>
This list doesn't necessarily have to be followed in all cases.
A. Yes, all users have the right to warn other users.
 
'''Q. I don't think I deserve my warning. What should I do?'''<br>
A. If you feel you don't deserve the warning, you have the option to [[MarioWiki:Appeals|appeal]] it as long as the warning in question was not given by an [[MarioWiki:Administrator|administrator]]. When appealing warnings, it is best to do so as soon as possible.
 
'''Q. Can I still be promoted even if I have warnings?'''<br>
A. Absolutely. Warnings are meant to keep track of your past activities, not to evaluate your current performance.
 
'''Q. Can I still be blocked without any warnings?'''<br>
A. If the offense is severe enough, it is possible to be blocked without any kind of warning.
 
==See Also==
*[[MarioWiki:Blocking Policy]]
*[[MarioWiki:Vandalism]]
*[[MarioWiki:Trolls]]

Latest revision as of 13:04, May 20, 2017

The series is continually adding games to its portfolio and we should be aware of guidelines set in place to deal with the new content these games are bringing. This page emphasizes on unreleased video games but will also cover any other type of unreleased media, which will collectively be referred to as “projects”. In addition, the page covers how information can turn into beta elements and what to do in case of a cancelled project. This page does not detail how to start an article on a new project, but rather how to deal with information regarding new games and other media.

Released vs. unreleased projects

If a project is slated for an international release, the project is considered released only when it is released in an English speaking country. This is because content may change in the translation process and Super Mario Wiki has a primarily English speaking audience. If the project clearly is not going to be released in an English speaking country and it has been released somewhere else, the project can be considered released. The official release date is what is used when determining when a project is released, regardless of when retailers start selling the product.

New articles pertaining to upcoming projects

Generally, new articles on subjects in upcoming projects are only allowed if the articles have sufficient information backed up by reliable references. Articles that only mention the future appearance of the subject or other minor details will be deleted immediately. If an article does have sufficient information, place {{new subject}} at the top of the page to point out that the article is subject to major changes. Once the information has been rewritten and more content has been added, the template may be removed.

Previously existing articles in upcoming projects

Information about subjects in upcoming projects with pre-existing articles is allowed as long as the information is not speculation and is accompanied by solid references. Unlike new articles pertaining to upcoming projects, there is no minimum for length of content. Statements like “[subject] may make an appearance in [future project]” are not allowed. When adding information about an upcoming project to an article, make a separate section to distinguish it from existing information. Place {{new subject-section}} at the top of this section to signal to other editors and readers that the information is subject to change because the project hasn’t been released yet. Once information has been rewritten and more content has been added, the template may be removed.

Beta elements, vaporware, and cancelled projects

It is almost inevitable that a project will have certain aspects of it cut or changed from the final product. The information before it is altered for the final product is referred to as beta elements. When editors discover discrepancies between information about an unreleased game and its final product, editors should move that information to the relevant beta elements page.

Although rare, it is possible for a project to be left in perpetual development or be completely cancelled. When the former occurs, the project is referred to as vaporware. When a project becomes vaporware or cancelled, a page should be created for the vaporware/cancelled project and all relevant information needs to be merged to that article.

References

Main article: MarioWiki:References

Whenever adding information about upcoming projects, it is necessary to cite your sources. This is because the information comes from secondary sources rather than the project itself. When making a new article or adding information to an existing article about an upcoming project, you need to cite your sources. Edits that do not follow this standard will be reverted without notice. Once the project has been released and the information is clearly present in the released project, you may remove these references. Just remember that references should stay in cases where the information is only present from secondary sources.

Revision

The procedure for rewriting information about an upcoming project upon release will vary depending on the quality of the information prior to the rewrite. You may follow this checklist for some guidance:

  1. Change all future tense words to present tense. For example, replace words like "will appear in" to "appears in".
  2. Remove unnecessary references. Examples of this are information with references which can readily be found in the released project.
  3. Add more content if possible.
  4. Add or update images/templates as necessary.
  5. Remove the {{new subject}} or {{new subject-section}} templates.

This list doesn't necessarily have to be followed in all cases.