Talk:Lucky Card: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
7feetunder (talk | contribs) |
7feetunder (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Which tag should I put here? It obviously needs one. This article is so short, it might as well not exist. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 17:00, 26 November 2017 (EST) | Which tag should I put here? It obviously needs one. This article is so short, it might as well not exist. -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 17:00, 26 November 2017 (EST) | ||
:Neither, unless the article is actually missing information. Short ≠ stub. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:03, 26 November 2017 (EST) | :Neither, unless the article is actually missing information. Short ≠ stub. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 17:03, 26 November 2017 (EST) | ||
::Well, it's obviously deprived of information, having only ''2 sentences!'' -{{User:YoshiFlutterJump/sig}} 17:13, 26 November 2017 (EST) | |||
:::Deprived of what information, specifically? Is there anything else to say about this item that the article doesn't already mention? If not, then no expansion/stub template is necessary. The fact that the article is short in and of itself is not a cause for alarm. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 18:08, 26 November 2017 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:12, November 26, 2017
Construction or Stub?[edit]
Which tag should I put here? It obviously needs one. This article is so short, it might as well not exist. -YFJ (talk · edits) 17:00, 26 November 2017 (EST)
- Neither, unless the article is actually missing information. Short ≠ stub.
17:03, 26 November 2017 (EST)
- Well, it's obviously deprived of information, having only 2 sentences! -YFJ (talk · edits) 17:13, 26 November 2017 (EST)
- Deprived of what information, specifically? Is there anything else to say about this item that the article doesn't already mention? If not, then no expansion/stub template is necessary. The fact that the article is short in and of itself is not a cause for alarm. 18:08, 26 November 2017 (EST)
- Deprived of what information, specifically? Is there anything else to say about this item that the article doesn't already mention? If not, then no expansion/stub template is necessary. The fact that the article is short in and of itself is not a cause for alarm.
- Well, it's obviously deprived of information, having only 2 sentences! -YFJ (talk · edits) 17:13, 26 November 2017 (EST)
