Talk:Butter Bridge: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(Undo revision 836017 by Alpheta (Talk) comment unrelated to article)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why are Butter Bridge 1 and Butter Bridge 2 merged together? They aren't the same level. {{User:Super-Yoshi/sig}}
Why are Butter Bridge 1 and Butter Bridge 2 merged together? They aren't the same level. {{User:Super-Yoshi/sig}}
:No they're not. I guess we can split them as soon as there's enough content even describing the levels. The second level isn't really described well. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 07:18, 4 January 2009 (EST)
:No they're not. I guess we can split them as soon as there's enough content even describing the levels. The second level isn't really described well. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 07:18, 4 January 2009 (EST)
::Neither of the levels are described very well... And I thought we decided to keep all levels from certain "Worlds" in the same article. Wouldn't that apply here? Or am I just making that up completely? {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}}
:::The proposal that led to the merging of the ''NSMB'' level articles into world articles was only about ''NSMB'', so that doesn't apply here. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 15:34, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Latest revision as of 00:47, August 24, 2010

Why are Butter Bridge 1 and Butter Bridge 2 merged together? They aren't the same level. Super-YoshiMust...eat...sig...Talk? C???

No they're not. I guess we can split them as soon as there's enough content even describing the levels. The second level isn't really described well. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 07:18, 4 January 2009 (EST)
Neither of the levels are described very well... And I thought we decided to keep all levels from certain "Worlds" in the same article. Wouldn't that apply here? Or am I just making that up completely? BLOC PARTIER.
The proposal that led to the merging of the NSMB level articles into world articles was only about NSMB, so that doesn't apply here. Time Questions 15:34, 4 January 2009 (EST)