MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/List of Paper Mario beta elements

List of Paper Mario beta elements

Remove Featured Article Status

1. Yoshi876 (talk) The starting section is 12 words, there is no way that can be used in the featured box so it violates rule 6. Usually, this would be a simple fix, but then you look at MarioWiki:Subpages Policy and find that it has to be like that. If it stays in its current state it is violating Rule 6, and if it's expanded so it follows Rule 6, it is in violation of policy.
2. Icemario11 (talk) If it's left like that, it can't be a featured list. If it's extended, it's breaking policy. There's no way this is staying featured.
3. Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Per Yoshi876. I don't think putting a Beta elements as a featured article is a good idea.

Keep Featured Article Status

1. Ztar Power (talk) The article was checked and fixed numerous times, after a long time, the only person opposing agreed it looked good enough and removed their vote. Pictures, well written, The short start is only a minor issue I can fix.
2. Baby Luigi (talk) This article got featured on the main page before without any issues of any sort. This is what it looked like. We can't expand the first section any more because it's a sub-page. We should go by the rules but not live by it; it still looks good when it's featured.
3. LeftyGreenMario (talk) The article should not be unfeatured just because some negligible problem concerning a paradox in the rules. Also, per my sister.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Ztar Power

1. Icemario11 (talk) Fixing it is a breach of policy.
2. Yoshi876 (talk) Per Ice.

Comments

@Ztar, you can't fix it because it will go against policy. Yoshi876 (talk)

Then who featured it in the first place? I'm fine with keeping it this way, the more, the better. Ztar Power (talk)

It's somewhere in the archives, and more the better isn't really valid, as FAs are meant to be the best articles, and if it's violating rules to be an FA it's not one of the best articles. Yoshi876 (talk)