MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{ | {{Fa-archive|nominated=17:24, 16 September 2008 (EDT)|passed=09:42, 11 October 2008 (EDT)}} | ||
|nominated=17:24, 16 September 2008 | |||
|passed= | |||
}} | |||
===[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]=== | ===[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]=== | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User:Garlic Man/sig}} - It's a long article, so I tried my best to find POV and other grammatical mistakes, and as I see it, it looks great. (And it does pass the 4,000 Characters rule) | #{{User:Garlic Man/sig}} - It's a long article, so I tried my best to find POV and other grammatical mistakes, and as I see it, it looks great. (And it does pass the 4,000 Characters rule) | ||
#{{User:Jaffffey/sig}} - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki. | #{{User:Jaffffey/sig}} - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki. | ||
#{{User:Magitroopa/sig}} - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long. | |||
#{{user:tanokki/sig}} A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy. | |||
#{{user|Luigi001}} It's ideal for an FA, so per all! | |||
#{{User|Steam5}} The Best Super Smash Bros. Series Game Ever! | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
I guess this is a bit of a ''de facto'' oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.{{User:Phoenix Rider/sig}} 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT) | I guess this is a bit of a ''de facto'' oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.{{User:Phoenix Rider/sig}} 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
I won't agree to this being featured until I've done a certain major edit. After that, it will be fine as a FA, I guess.{{User:Dom/sig}} | |||
:You may want to oppose the nomination, since it has met FA requirements. If not opposed, it will be featured on October 18. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 02:06, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | |||
::I'm not gonna oppose. But my major edit will be done after October 18th (I'm busy), and then I will personally approve of the article's quality. {{User:Dom/sig}} | |||
:::Actually it would be best if you did oppose. 'cause otherwise the article is gonna be featured when it's not actually fine yet. (I didn't read it, so I cannot say anything about its quality) {{User:Time Q/sig}} 09:56, 15 October 2008 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:03, May 28, 2018
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Smash Bros. Brawl was nominated to be a featured article at 17:24, 16 September 2008 (EDT) and passed at 08:42, 18 October 2008.
Super Smash Bros. Brawl
Support
- Marcelagus (T • C • E) - It's a long article, so I tried my best to find POV and other grammatical mistakes, and as I see it, it looks great. (And it does pass the 4,000 Characters rule)
- MisterJaffffey
G0 Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki. - Storm Warrior - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long.
- user:tanokki [1]
A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy. - Luigi001 (talk) It's ideal for an FA, so per all!
- Steam5 (talk) The Best Super Smash Bros. Series Game Ever!
Oppose
Comments
- I must say I'm very apprehensive about this one. Skimming through it, the Gameplay section needs work, as does a lot of the SSE Story section. The tables, especially for the stages, need work.
I guess this is a bit of a de facto oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.Phoenix Rider 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
I won't agree to this being featured until I've done a certain major edit. After that, it will be fine as a FA, I guess.
»» 
- You may want to oppose the nomination, since it has met FA requirements. If not opposed, it will be featured on October 18. Time Questions 02:06, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
